X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=yp8 jYwCiR+u9yaCFeTYkvZvWNmd12v09Be7MxyFEXoT+WQmw0eEwtIcR0RANGzN9psc 7lu4hxMcKb1eJ+4Z5V4bATElc4bwF/f/KqAoNVcwZPgGwly+SiOwmiiZ53fQgZWh D1V753ub38afGqYS8qUgJFYyaFD2pj8S3imXH3eY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=default; bh=cetq2THYm 3aBQataxPz923mxFeY=; b=FIDXgTReaKdJGI+h/Ce2JQKR4ONTn+/l1CNxng2Rh T2R1VDs3raQoKsFWhyO/wwcZLZiG7JR+c3Gd4mCsF6F+bjA8bjjpMeGUeesxsGbo bhtXEfvsgqOrg2ObdRu29Pw+Zt/P/1n+1oVv1aN7Eb+1wgFHggcqWqtIKHgpDIYu VE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*RU:sk:cluster, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:cluster, H*RU:15.0.1076.9, H*r:15.0.1076.9 X-HELO: cluster-j.mailcontrol.com From: "Lemke, Michael ST/HZA-ZIC2" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: Re: Performance of "ls -F" Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:57:42 +0000 Message-ID: <41076f65fe0d4efebcda60c178623779@DE013815.schaeffler.com> x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u0P9w6Eq001696 I just want to add an observation and stay out of this conversation otherwise: ls -F is comparably slow on a network drive here but as noted by someone else in this thread ls --file-type is fast. However, the combination ls --file-type --color is as slow as ls -F here. Maybe a hint for you to find out what is going on. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple