X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=qwG7Qabk4YYrvu2Y8BEC
	4xnfWzurpVHTrnsz1FuRS36gZnQwrPpWO8lKS7s/EMQymrCckRQ7Qshzb2huw25z
	9VSBeNV++QOs6VolGsUE/gvOrSSLOXoyBUTceL8sUlfLh7W3PZbOi9S2xNAbfCMx
	JUxFfIaSiBuU4Cbjeid/p8g=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; s=default; bh=+Zm556TpFcqERdzdOhPCGfUk9I
	I=; b=ysmmjx2rljHkNukgMub7IeHQ3v6KMEjDCl6wSC7NbAw6ukDVnHNS7V4dfJ
	PtFbf08HnLg170cf6EoafkOEPiuHant03gohlYEeC9IULbX3DkbmFvCmqGS+nmvr
	skFJq6elbpQKHKjqErDdDHLWVRsHI0NQM3Z72dedDK0JWQ2js=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:ed7dd33, H*f:sk:1211985, H*i:sk:1211985, she
X-HELO: lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:42:31 +0100
From: Houder <houder AT xs4all DOT nl>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: snapshots (archive files) are too big ... Why?
In-Reply-To: <1211985131.20160123172147@yandex.ru>
References: <ed7dd3377a4cc1aa59001d627c7237ad AT xs4all DOT nl> <1211985131 DOT 20160123172147 AT yandex DOT ru>
Message-ID: <f74c5822d8dfd9a2606010c5762f9e9d@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: houder AT xs4all DOT nl (jIYHj8nTyMTtoQwPNUbIaQ==)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Hi Andrey,

On 2016-01-23 15:21, Andrey Repin wrote:

> But this is actually a problem.

Not sure ...extraction appears NOT to be a problem ... (yes, the same
file is extracted multiple times).

On the other hand, the "big" archive file might indicate there is room
for improvement ...

However, it might be so that the person who wrote the script believes
that she/he can only rely on Lamport's clock:

The "version" of the file, that survives the extraction process, will
be the one that was last appended to the archive file ...

     http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/tar.html#SEC59

See 4.2.2.2 Multiple Members with the Same Name.

Of course, I am just guessing ... that is why I wrote: I am curious.

Regards,
Henri

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple