X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=QjDT2HN0M8u2bD+nJ6ExqTfMMGSyEmTKWk0rlbNqNw1BNcSTWKIdS rwBMjUuv/aFZAZrOXsQWiTv3GKD1iDJNZf+ASeL3uFcIvpc1IfimATMYRSV8/Q6Z jin574Q4ewv9fv8nBGJ0zTzc3l78nbpjNl3f/a1XelzL0TbPbk/eQA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=POzj0HeZZ+xhNs0HJNLuoAqytCI=; b=SFYiz9ioDVXwwAibrYi/c5xTvWBg WHGcHxyVd6BolwXQ6LgmF1suKFwYON7DJliM/ukWvlRTbRyxroYiHqKDaBWW1IkE muNVVpbcsSUrW92OKn3+JS1T6WkvH88M1mJRnpZ85YhIYyms1NpXtJ/W138uVgsK y5BE5GTDw0JWeQ8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,KAM_COUK,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=wohlferd, Wohlferd, Compiling, H*f:sk:56A1B7E X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Roger Orr Subject: Re: Compiling gcc trunk under cygwin Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <56A1B7E3 DOT 3030202 AT LimeGreenSocks DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes David Wohlferd LimeGreenSocks.com> writes: > Until recently, I've been able to build gcc under cygwin just fine. But > (relatively) recent checkins (232454 & 232071) are causing problems. Have you reported the problems with 232454 to gcc yet? I've already reported the 232071 problem, on the original bug report this was trying to fix. See gcc's bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 Roger. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple