X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=KQF+s+Tn6/tPB4/zxtd4QpcXowvayPWLXgj0T3npaqNu5xyUdh60v
	MmAFSNQz82wGLaQZaWs77KzIK9lOH0XVF9HWQAS3z+4RjAdohEbw2bd5bKR5O5Y5
	6lQAi9NWw9HXedlqfXhwiC0FavPiRJ99WyfKLlyBfFRCzU+DdX6wNQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	 bh=rZkLVwrnq94dpz1Mw13jGovznOM=; b=X/zrZDpsraNV3paU4uP3YvHq2E+i
	fX+L0hEo1WmUhJFnKnYFYYs/MOEICt60jeb9jPIQM5hxRVZtFPSgfwkddMXigMJu
	UcbL0AtjIKSJy2+q6YWY8ez8im74xTLb3TtSbdEugXWO/HdWPOK5e0EZz2dn+KK4
	SnGJqvAtol03voE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=86, SMB, smb, H*f:sk:CAH5rLZ
X-HELO: plane.gmane.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT NexGo DOT DE>
Subject: Re: Performance of "ls -F"
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:30:06 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <loom.20160122T082744-501@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom DOT 20160121T163405-489 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CAH5rLZVWiGz2n-3Ru-C0_5KU-Cc4NipJPn1NQVphN2UetUK4iA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <3a9ff6ec2d5e4e64a96a8f8e31d12f22 AT ntmaexbe04 DOT bedford DOT progress DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Bill Smith <bsmith <at> progress.com> writes:
> The difference is 1.3 seconds versus 1 minute 7 seconds.  The directory is
identical on the two NetApps and
> they both contain ~29K files.  C-dot (Cluster Data On Tap) is the newest
operating system for the NetApp.  It
> also supports the newer SMB protocols.
> 
> I also tried the experiment with MKS Toolkit 8.6 and in both cases, it
takes around .1 seconds.

Could you please show the result for running /usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo on the
two directories?


Regards,
Achim.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple