X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=q0Ipjz9Fj5B/LA1p
	ux41ix1LIaLre7eoi0oerWfkvXKhDdxlMFoetyzbNFIr4KT7fj3dBj4NehU/hDks
	qRXKFmfEurgUyRTEcpdco2MmnNZEnNONWM5fY+i9ZHiP6TGmjRmgpkFIZxcBH0SK
	AVv5UiXHwnESe9R5SQE7PB0gjOM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=GyUTKGd6JLGLMIEO/tKqsP
	H6Vik=; b=P/mKYBSrr32M+9StNDv1tutDPsMmMbA3HwzGPND90lT8y299FqzXI9
	RhhZPASZuejo7I8RNOw+EHBVI8WCSStWgLlsLJmJAxbXzxR8F5WxEID/nz/VUJN8
	lQOESG3HNK9p100Cz90wBdQcEPj8jfI5zPKqcPmRWMX7E24TEoVDM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:CACoZoo, H*i:sk:CACoZoo, soderquist, Soderquist
X-HELO: mail-ig0-f169.google.com
X-Received: by 10.50.40.8 with SMTP id t8mr14166879igk.26.1452542385890;        Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Windows XP Support
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <56924AB1 DOT 1070903 AT gmx DOT de> <5692DBF5 DOT 3040100 AT comcast DOT net> <5692EEA8 DOT 4000703 AT gmail DOT com> <CACoZoo2nLSGtobnr-CMJBFkHzQou0RGGf5Hhgj9TLwD9Vr4rqw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: cyg Simple <cygsimple AT gmail DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <569409B4.3040501@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:59:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACoZoo2nLSGtobnr-CMJBFkHzQou0RGGf5Hhgj9TLwD9Vr4rqw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 1/11/2016 12:05 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez wrote:
>> No software version can live forever, ... <snip>
> 
> Personally, I have to disagree with this statement, or at least offer
> an amendment...
> 
> I have some things still running in DOS 5 in a virtual machine because
> that is the most effective environment to run them in, and I don't
> expect any future OS to change that.  Does this mean I have these
> accessible to the outside world?  Absolutely not.  So while I do see
> use cases for very long outdated packages, I will also agree these use
> cases are not mainstream by any means, and if your use case does
> warrant an old package, appropriate measures to isolate the old
> packages also need to be taken.
> 

Arguments like this is the reason I had to spend years searching through
COBOL code for 2 digit years.  Old habits seem hard to die.  Either
upgrade or forever pay the penalty yourself to keep the old code running.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple