X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Z6S8XKTxhQFLrcPg1EfyqRkgHpTMNHN6sH8tJ7d2XuhA7vqK/nLIi
	kRgF+3LjGPgH+4pa+u4j5k0ys6NZURJOkRLbBZREPYA1qST+Ytv1FxiFisk/ncRC
	gHF6UELNYF1BO/4Al79TmuFx12J+Ty6J2POEqTD+pp8DA8sWwie8ws=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=zX2zKNXLxjLR3v+SEJyAD6uDV/M=; b=NiWjLg9mm0UG4awjNgIc7dTVbbwN
	zyMcJH1vsc38vOK1O2WKYKr1PpNhoL9iglwLnJkyd0E56nuVuPuGhKDBIngo7iaV
	WevD70ws0Q+L88YuUYYl+pHEoYkW/rNAWZDHrdKJRw8vKkMevifuNl3f+AHrLBHg
	WqwstJBOjLo1o2Q=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-101.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KHOP_DYNAMIC,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=filesystem, confusing, H*r:500, followed
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:55:23 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Pipes Again -- a simple test case
Message-ID: <20160111115523.GD32610@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <0aebd09993901f3ef3ff728d162952cd AT xs4all DOT nl> <568A32BE DOT 4080101 AT gmail DOT com> <c7ebcc77c3ee94c4a81c48ebbdc81de9 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20160108151933 DOT GI20447 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <83235106e7ed2fcfde26293d156be51d AT xs4all DOT nl> <20160108163055 DOT GK20447 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160108163055.GK20447@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

--FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jan  8 17:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan  8 17:12, Houder wrote:
> > On 2016-01-08 16:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Jan  4 10:24, Houder wrote:
> > >>On 2016-01-04 09:52, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >>>On 04/01/2016 09:03, Houder wrote:
> > >>>>Hi Corinna,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I have been looking for an STC to show why cmp fails on Cygwin (and=
 to
> > >>>>show the
> > >>>>difference between Cygwin and Linux).
> > >>>>
> > >>>>The STC below creates a pipe (pipe() is used), followed by calls to
> > >>>>fstat() and
> > >>>>stat() for both the read end and the write end of the pipe.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>(I also tested with popen()/pclose(): same result)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Regards,
> > >>>>Henri
> > >
> > >Thanks for the STC.  However, given how this stuff works internally,
> > >I have no good solution off the top of my head.  I played with various
> > >ideas but to no avail.  I add this to my TODO list, but I probably
> > >won't have a quick solution :(
> > >
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Corinna
> > >
> > >
> > >P.S: It would be really helpful if you could stick to the original
> > >     thread and simply use "reply-to" once a discussion has started.
> > >     It's very confusing having to connect the various threads.  Thank=
s.
> >=20
> > Perhaps David B. can be helped by a Cygwin-specific patching to "cmp"? =
Eric?
> >=20
> > ... replacing the call to fstat() by a call to stat() ...
> > (as shown in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-12/msg00348.html)
> >=20
> > By the way, thank you for reporting back to "us" about this. I already
> > feared that a "general" solution would have to wait ... You have already
> > too much on your plate.
> >=20
> > As a final point, I also tested FIFOs and (unix domain) sockets.
> >=20
> > FIFOs pass the test, sockets do not.
>=20
> Yes, that's expected.  The underlying hack^Wmethod is the same for sockets
> and pipes, while FIFOs have a real path on a real filesystem and thus have
> a real inode number to fetch in stat/fstat.

I applied a patch to make this work.  Please give the latest developer
snapshot from https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ a try.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=stWG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FFoLq8A0u+X9iRU8--