X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=jNMWuOSQMozUozbaErO7 KcYmUSrzk3KarK5mEu+6gZ4a9FTpDySRcVqvC2w9Kdx9wU1IGR8iRi0LbJHbcBKU u05htYRVj0afaTKrGZF9qCZOpkjMY5ziSJ/VpUUq/QB6rB0r2v3pF9zMcjw6I3SJ Zp7qH0JBAgKV7ycruYmcmBw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:message-id; s=default; bh=8OF6obtKVZWotzj/T2rrh5ETkl U=; b=VJBcHQC7/D6mic5/tPFXIELFfqJyco6lgQzA0U+i4uNV9dgE0BDfjwd7M3 9ilvZlheixel/7Y9vhgVleiJL8Ao7UrDbFZJbgMtAFeJur93pijvuSOeLoNkJGcL Unbc+XYp76pgA1A6EF9a07kz24QLsvySGs6umH7ptMwarpcaM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=helped, H*F:D*nl, Henri, houder X-HELO: lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:12:57 +0100 From: Houder To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Pipes Again -- a simple test case In-Reply-To: <20160108151933.GI20447@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <0aebd09993901f3ef3ff728d162952cd AT xs4all DOT nl> <568A32BE DOT 4080101 AT gmail DOT com> <20160108151933 DOT GI20447 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Message-ID: <83235106e7ed2fcfde26293d156be51d@xs4all.nl> X-Sender: houder AT xs4all DOT nl (QV0n/x0leoqrOFoUzx/zQg==) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2016-01-08 16:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 4 10:24, Houder wrote: >> On 2016-01-04 09:52, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> >On 04/01/2016 09:03, Houder wrote: >> >>Hi Corinna, >> >> >> >>I have been looking for an STC to show why cmp fails on Cygwin (and to >> >>show the >> >>difference between Cygwin and Linux). >> >> >> >>The STC below creates a pipe (pipe() is used), followed by calls to >> >>fstat() and >> >>stat() for both the read end and the write end of the pipe. >> >> >> >>(I also tested with popen()/pclose(): same result) >> >> >> >>Regards, >> >>Henri > > Thanks for the STC. However, given how this stuff works internally, > I have no good solution off the top of my head. I played with various > ideas but to no avail. I add this to my TODO list, but I probably > won't have a quick solution :( > > > Thanks, > Corinna > > > P.S: It would be really helpful if you could stick to the original > thread and simply use "reply-to" once a discussion has started. > It's very confusing having to connect the various threads. > Thanks. Perhaps David B. can be helped by a Cygwin-specific patching to "cmp"? Eric? ... replacing the call to fstat() by a call to stat() ... (as shown in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-12/msg00348.html) By the way, thank you for reporting back to "us" about this. I already feared that a "general" solution would have to wait ... You have already too much on your plate. As a final point, I also tested FIFOs and (unix domain) sockets. FIFOs pass the test, sockets do not. Regards, Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple