X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=nX/xyUeKevfQ6X/yma76+hrHzVWsQl UUF7nfYrJCm5KMDxcpBgXlg8rEU8+Uc++1D4bn4NPfBZHh4JHG9Mp8RyfTHYJK3q z3FwJlWwCazsbjqSf9Gn/0LgNd04JnXWG76FZFDx1aCyXQMUOR5cxuQMqND3KspF P3mpJBCaBR+90= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=B5IxbPRoJDxpez1t7+e3C8QwyBo=; b=W/tz 8o6UYsYFdM9LimIeMZCtcslH+kXnPnK5JpYgFWV5Q0ZeUCQqffBwuiKFoSHuoojC C/G6EgKLJ0BOcRN29W0hMtIREoTEMnUbuk1CiKR2cRSWYGQSCCBbri1knIsZznXz g7mI832xkU9iTLtXGvWkEFK5YElp4bnrbffSAEk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=packer, Packer, H*f:sk:n5dslj$, H*i:sk:n5dslj$ X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: perl version error Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:23:04 +0100 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <5679E096 DOT 5050507 AT cornell DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Am 23.12.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Achim Gratz: > Maybe, although I'd consider it a bug if it's barfing on a minor version > update since there is no binary or API incompatibility among minor > versions (as long as they're built with the same options of course). Turns out this is indeed a longstanding bug (and one upstream is likely to continue ignoring) that PAR::Packer uses the version string as a proxy for ABI compatibility: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=92352 The package is in the hands of Yaakov, so either he's going to provide an update shortly or you downgrade Perl to 5.22.0 for the moment. If a new package is made available, I wouldn't mind if the version check was patched to check the last component for greater-or-equal instead of equal. Testing for equality makes no sense unless we'd bundle PAR::Packer with the perl package in Cygwin. -- Achim. (on the road :-) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple