X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=VzISpy8s3nS3wvVcg6YV
	dSViiLBicTjuIKrbvuKpV3vjnt6WZh8mW7ajWLjVzxQiUF3U46/G36/Cu4pveY8R
	hAz5SIgPufK2ewO1p0FFnO25M+9SKgl+/cCzTHorrlzxcih5gwvwAmi8SiP6FIXO
	eJWsl3Vn1p8hpQ6mOk2BdjU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:message-id; s=default; bh=Xpy+8+M2etlKxcJUoAxh2CtoA0
	E=; b=WaRczIOzRr1gYENePIijen3Vtms6dBWz65DckKIw+0adIga7aBVsHBEKyc
	SdKvh87tPONv1rdjbun5kFMYaiCuWTvYevmBclBUgyPDJs3CJjPUQfYxy3WPsB2I
	GQlDToOpRVTSPpVVXaJ8dp1R9MU+C0YoztKvHG768xR0eYyKg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=extensively, deleteing, According, 2.4.0-0.15
X-HELO: lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:11:19 +0100
From: Houder <houder AT xs4all DOT nl>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setfacl(2.4.0.14): recalculation of the ACL mask entry
In-Reply-To: <20151221124645.GE4034@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <4e359179a04344745b43991e66398a6e AT xs4all DOT nl> <20151221124645 DOT GE4034 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Message-ID: <ffff3f0e0637e84689521a4a046dec69@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: houder AT xs4all DOT nl (mPQ3pQvi6hzwlVqGaRT4yw==)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2015-12-21 13:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 20 18:52, Houder wrote:
>> Hi Corinna,
>> 
>> According to acl(5), the mask entry (as reported by getacl) is 
>> "optional" if
>> the
>> acl contains no 'u:uid:perm' and/or 'g:gid:perm' entries (ace's) ... 
>> Ahem.
>> [...]
>> However, setfacl(1) and your setfacl also note, that the default 
>> behaviour
>> of
>> setfacl is to recalculate the mask entry ...
>> [...]
>> I decided to experiment ... See below. (the mask entry is not 
>> recalculated,
>> it
>> appears).
> 
> It is, but only in a limit number of scenarios.  I completely forgot
> about recalculating when deleteing ACEs, in fact.  I checked this
> against setfacl on Linux again, appied a patch and uploaded a new test
> release 2.4.0-0.15.  The mask recalculation behaviour should now be
> as close as possible to Linux, I hope.  I also renamed the --substitute
> option to --set, as with Linux setfacl.
> 
> Please give it a try.  Just, if it's still wrong, I guess a patch has
> to wait until after the holidays.

Euh ... no problem here. Go, have a holiday!

Regards,
Henri

> 
> 
> Thanks a lot for testing this so extensively,
> Corinna


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple