X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=VYbrSXEo3Bs+1Tj1 bEnUxBdVG4lXc0nPfArpcrCdAngDGjXn8uI23ThXEFGQwElrZV9anwFcoKDzVetQ mnNFUN1xwfffQoSrYpE1+eNRIynkSjRKjsyV7fWScrjtunEpzswPPUXTt8L4bPNy YDDB7qLGfQJnDkH+G9YGFBCutxc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=R8yl1T39iICSAOE0vnkp05 PDzyk=; b=ngZGR6DJ67mjz8kb+E5Osun2VQcyx248uZkPO2XM2qspQELQv7e7JF ftvj0XB+Z/+zoFKzXGER+21J9MAxLuv6P4D1XNv7JQDKuj3JG+HIWNuSJhMHLNvq ke/2SpW1lzKDqOM7mUdD9riwK+0+6RkpSqXLZyHs2de/srRS/70MA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qg0-f45.google.com X-Received: by 10.140.178.139 with SMTP id y133mr8534925qhy.92.1450025457377; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 08:50:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ and stdio.h To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: cyg Simple X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <566DA207.3080008@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:51:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 12/12/2015 2:51 AM, KIMURA Masaru wrote: > Hi, > > is cygwin's __STRICT_ANSI__ and stdio.h behavior not so compatible to glibc's? > especially, i meant routines in POSIX 1003.1:2001 (popen(), pclose(), etc). > for a specific example, see a cparser issue[1] i submitted. > Cygwin isn't wrong. __STRICT_ANSI__ doesn't mix with POSIX. __STRICT_ANSI__ definitions is what you should look at for the defined API; not POSIX 1003.1:2001. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple