X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=ojX1WZjW9F7cOK1ub5WaHVRfjqdwuISVM7Y9QKO2C6U4NOhnG3OOW M4GrCX621oRWAqZ0B1Sdw64qkfJ/tHFdTiCDGGRNG7Aml1iKsrUrvu5ubgHzBiMd G+huvDkw/ZIvEZ/MHv9Wj1DP+6K+t73Wc8t0VMiOhYDu6KChH4ffbk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=9Xvj325GpDLpPptyW25Ehy8TUd4=; b=GnWjkcUlmtcbtN3+CBfR0vB7fOt8 3iRsnwnZrbbiqkLv6UDhxEsNJaz3G/k2xsrBX/CP2O/RN34XwM9pKlGVRPPtf5JD KWR1JnVeolvDTxsv5qCoxlQb3z8GQiC/9qhopbnn53mBGoQi1gs37rAxFwZCOgwm fdiWYiRD4/icY3E= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:04:22 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4 Message-ID: <20151206190422.GB18409@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <87io4bucep DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20151206140852 DOT GB17433 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87a8pntzua DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8pntzua.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Dec 6 15:29, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> VPN access with the worst possible terrestrial roundtrip has been test= ed > >> for the same case now and goes from 52s to ~1700s or a factor of 33. = So > >> roundtrip delay adds an additional factor of about 3, but the server > >> response time seems to play the dominant role even in that scenario. > > > > Uhm... is that good or bad now?!? Do you still think adding this > > functionality is a good idea? >=20 > For most of the things I did it worked OK, so I still think AuthZ should > be used. Ok, thanks a lot. I'm just wondering if I should really push this to stable state, given the fact that I won't be available starting next week until 2016-01-06. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWZIa2AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gQc0P/jEIUoIxGVSIBbMIpU9hG7zW s2R3g1VOmUEpRoGsPpbV+axlIuIO24uqTHFRheNf+gvvNrVSxB1PJ37rZmv+cnOu pBB2e23YQTBplMOLuJXnqre5IdFh+CguF25+PGUff8YkY84lZ78voe2S8HAx+IrU y6+PtaRwsNeIZ7QPuLXiJWJ6ldQB8QiPAZpa7ohncWeyUzNIcuBHadiJKBtl5r5z tuMrQFBbuOQU47GRE224lfK3zqlc0auuTsFZxA4SAEyAP3tzStrfA42y+GK4sHS3 siZ+NZZ0Q5LG9tLpadketa2GEPPX7RTDjE4nvI5pEUQaGqVUaeLAuYyzF38XkCSs j9rhcqyOUxBG77e+kBm0LRrIU8U8WxZRteh7KB8OzYukfQGrU6Zt9lUF7iX8n12e wDt2FkU1+pXGPxi4FWuNNxM+3v+EgqTsdemR+M6cGu2jIH7GM4GsyGygzz0+oN2z bVwqejOeJZ5peHTY8Biv2L4G/1308SW9PKIQhlJ4XYz9i2wUqcN46FetVBaD5C21 pesRSuHGFlsc3Qlr2IzkpXIGnjqlTU11LSuY5x9c4RHL9kkH6MjwlReW57wv/Xeb ISzbK2zw5B/QYUn1tMRlvcmQhS5yoUNCJowUf2wLljOzOSICTJB/FlQw515v8tC0 rtDWQaak58URfxMk43cb =TBLr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS--