X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=PCw5En0c3DWEsJwqdzneCWv9zrprFpzYTnIqNbbk+vFNpXOr/HScK HovZNydrHY0PI4c2mBtiBo3Oygw+m7qEnl4C7KzC4wrfvvZxWX22ettGnglrNSD9 1Z8KL+ZwnkZc0xrRt/i8XAsYkt7ZW5Nwkcab4tFv+bcnFVC8/QoQwY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=3yeQYcwLUAGcNUqsNNb9JWUHpck=; b=Fi5PMWeyhVOKHrDjICtgKnax7feJ o0IC4iV8sq1Fq2RqSJLwkxO7/q/+bAgj6BbTleN8GQdKnZut1HZnt7tSb347lCxC JZo3r1Cugiyw6LdEjZ3+4vHlvTurwTjANAdOm9FyUmTooCcTSefmtfxSMeYnusTW MLYu4cY2HGT3oYc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:08:52 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4 Message-ID: <20151206140852.GB17433@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <87io4bucep DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l76fUT7nc3MelDdI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87io4bucep.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Dec 6 10:58, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > > On my local laptop things look a bit different, a small ~5% subset of t= he > > test above goes from 20s to 200s and a different larger ~10% subset fro= m 50s > > to 500s. While that hurts, the more usual case with many files from the > > same user doesn't feel any slower at the moment. The access through VPN > > will be interesting, though... >=20 > VPN access with the worst possible terrestrial roundtrip has been tested > for the same case now and goes from 52s to ~1700s or a factor of 33. So > roundtrip delay adds an additional factor of about 3, but the server > response time seems to play the dominant role even in that scenario. Uhm... is that good or bad now?!? Do you still think adding this functionality is a good idea? Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWZEF0AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gm18QAI4LaG7h2rHL0QbBbyFfJSKY XSI7Yae7sbyCRhQGGQU8KVjylQMl+JIavqaReQBXVBfvVHyMtEAHGVs9urL1cAd2 ayA7N1jFPzgNjKnBnvzE10bMnLhqOf2Se7XQgepYsi9xUKYOlfGXeYAEcKsBRXtM 80LXAYzUAl/elpYVILkbQcmQQlsFEjDprnsZm7bvpWDBL5P5lXPf/lAAaMJU8Azy IO3ksn8UVl9IrjCfJk1iPg1+uxUkhhIRO637oGhH+Va88ZaL6lAtg4hjSuT2YunJ 1yACql27vv6mS44Bvt1rRwFyDyxNu1vU12mSgKaeSnQZjFoKGMx+smweVBEtEvD9 H4HegoAipxlDhGhKRbg7wVZBs6u47ZDarJDsHTH7n00vRAFHl3hGzS62yvnT7DoS eeMwOn1ag2+cFNGGE/TBTdXfITg60zWVWKtj6Fqgpciag9P8NTofC0KG/toP1Mz7 6fihT/9cinTWpp55IJ4If0gXbeKwp2E1Vh807zYCLe3QRrdz0a7uE/JORsvBUBsN ZZM5BejA9o5IGD/Q5ExYpNCi7y9po3ynOmPBLjttl/3R0JEI/Wl0E2gCFh4yZTM2 WE0EdjPFMJGeJ1zH+i/Th/d3iek7dxLPCt5u4y870XrLbSVxbrwMMhGAsJisDFrj V+h659ERJp/WmuXMPRpS =K/QV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI--