X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=R6kGK/Fzi06SpX+t DDsshgsmhppFP8DFNHglIzXjcn9Cx9tCibx2GDXEITp9PuDU5j5HZeWat5k5b+xu 037jUaw/iZhE9BxP8a4hZALlR7Pxtd9gZlayOEXCMrsnTMx5stHf6w+ugV3BpDk+ APolpNhUVuSvrLlseOviIrupB08= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=zBMoShk+SvEBRNlgQHHCV9 pvlY8=; b=cPV+FpIAErHjjMnlwyZd5zG/KDeGHyogxpc2NyxgyMt46427TssvN8 kUZt+YqT4F9f3knuwk50lb9t1vrqug4wL7PIabsvlQUHhW6pXIAor20VAv0eFX91 vGCgvGOWkBTG3u1n27tpWsvnKo5+Muo3DA8UmFMCCMbE6JgVGVVn0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_80,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: m0.truegem.net Subject: Re: Cygwin multithreading performance References: <564E3017 DOT 90205 AT maxrnd DOT com> <5650379B DOT 4030405 AT maxrnd DOT com> <20151121105301 DOT GE2755 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5652C402 DOT 7040006 AT maxrnd DOT com> <24780-1448274431-7444 AT sneakemail DOT com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: <5653B52B.5000804@maxrnd.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:54:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24780-1448274431-7444@sneakemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Hein wrote: > Mark Geisert wrote at 23:45 -0800 on Nov 22, 2015: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Nov 21 01:21, Mark Geisert wrote: > > [...] so I wonder if there's > > >> some unintentional serialization going on somewhere, but I don't know yet > > >> how I could verify that theory. > > > > > > If I'm allowed to make an educated guess, the big serializer in Cygwin > > > are probably the calls to malloc, calloc, realloc, free. We desperately > > > need a new malloc implementation better suited to multi-threading. > > > > That's very helpful to know. I'd want to first make sure the heavy lock > > activity I'm seeing in the traces really is due to malloc() and friends > > but I couldn't help a speculative search online for multithread-safe > > malloc(). These turned up: > > tcmalloc - part of google-perftools, requires libunwind, evidently > > not yet ported to Windows AFAICT, > > nedmalloc - http://www.nedprod.com/programs/portable/nedmalloc/ > > ptmalloc - http://www.malloc.de/ > > > > The latter two are based on Doug Lea's dlmalloc which is also the basis > > of Cygwin's malloc() functions. As I understand it, ptmalloc in one > > form or another has been part of glibc on Linux for some time. > > > > So there may be a solution in sight if we need to go that direction. Of > > course, SHTDI as usual :). > > > > ...mark > > Someone recently mentioned on this list they were working on porting > jemalloc. That would be a good choice. Indeed; thanks for the reminder. Somehow I hadn't followed that thread. ..mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple