DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=kEDl2WWqLYc1kw+rl30oO3Bq+N4+hWkzOevjoQqqtBnCRkwjNJm86
	ITucEDre+xwJK4LvuaMv6vU0RMWcVTBJn2zPlRLMkjpzLJXCdLJDNQPl5DK2lYT/
	JyBWcIxdbSDWjwJhgjWIsKKVf2/M0T19Fuf5DscXLgzHSMepwW/5WM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:48:43 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: does anyone care about package minor version bump announcements?
Message-ID: <20151119154843.GB2755@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <tmor4bp8h0osb27rn2sn4mviph91391247 AT 4ax DOT com> <564DE847 DOT 2000502 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <564DE847.2000502@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 19 10:18, cyg Simple wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 10:13 AM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > Does anyone care about that?  Lately I don't.  In fact I've skipped sen=
ding
> > the last few, and no one seems to have noticed.
> >=20
> > Can we leave it to the maintainer's discretion about whether they need =
to
> > send one of those on every update?  Maybe it already is, and I didn't k=
now.
> > Of course some updates are important or need explanation or a headsup, =
and
> > then the maintainer should send one.
>=20
> My opinion is that every time the package is modified there should be an
> announcement of the new package and what was changed.  Pointing to a
> ChangeLog may be fine but not announcing the change is just wrong.

I agree.  Maybe cygport's new (in testing) "announce" command simplifies
it enough to be not much of a burden?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=x+ty
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--