DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=AlbvjMOaza0qhUU9abGN00mcHOAShb3qpEx4xdM2MSEfnT6M42Oft
	pl9xHTyReCrqp/HT75t19MEKi54E/Ti/oWmcSrFWghzexHMcQqPP5QLa0wR6pLvE
	vJwt3127+16L57g6BdncGQcGLciK78DZneLBP3qjdYH4pcLwnvpfbQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:50:12 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.7
Message-ID: <20151106125012.GA26566@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 20151106092658 DOT GA30065 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <563C8B08 DOT 9000405 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <563C8B08.9000405@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov  6 12:12, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 10:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi Cygwin friends and users,
> >
> >
> >I released a new TEST version of Cygwin, 2.3.0-0.7.
> >
> >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >
> >IMPORTANT NOTE:
> >
> >   The upcoming official 2.3.0 release, which I'm planning for next
> >   Monday, will not yet contain the below described ACL changes.  I got
> >   not enough feedback from testers to be confident enough to put this
> >   into a release.
> >
> >   When I release 2.3.0-1, I also immediately release a 2.4.0-0.1
> >   test release to allow undisruptive testing of the new ACL code.
> >
> >   Please guys, I really need feedback for this stuff.
> >
> >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>=20
> Hi Corinna,
> I have not seen anything strange until now;
> however as a single user in a not domain environment
> I doubt my task case is particularly meaningful.

Thanks all the same!  One of the sore points is performance hit when
using AuthZ to fetch the effective user permissions.  How's your
impression?  Is it noticable in your environment?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=3b7i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--