X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=nElyMLdBDDUpCmiJwTzDfcGdvQHiRW P3YbhJb3FLGk1PC91HQtp2K71uh/z+GwUE5UnNU+gez9/hR7BOBIkiBzfdfVMCmv tAtrsGUW58R5OgZHc25SDkk9WiY/35BEY+Gx2+0VpertXlizgMY9MiL9k+v3eg8R z6K0zZDxzcKBU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=pet6uS5wNskqGFtjQrfSnfeGi3I=; b=mP8m w1OtW7RZzow0CXM2zyuUhd+k/pJpFefOA0iU9e6pjLQ5r2s20NpYLlcpYzqF8jCA HiV+k9LlZoudcvVos68r1PApcAdFmQGJchiJa7GNqDcgGQVs27IX0SZ+m6p63c5t cDqDxgTsx6miKHssxpxFhE+bDa1qU3WPzjlhmBY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.3.0-0.4 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:53:44 +0100 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <20151026100756 DOT GC31990 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <562E4ED0 DOT 7020907 AT Nexgo DOT DE> <20151027092722 DOT GN5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <20151027092722.GN5319@calimero.vinschen.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Am 27.10.2015 um 10:27 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: >> That test is almost as bad as it can ever get. Given that enumerating all >> AD accouts with mkpasswd takes about 2 hours and I'm doing something very >> similar here, I'm not even surprised. I was more surprised to see the >> server go so fast, but my guess is that it can use jumbo frames to talk to >> the AD. > > Ok, so you don't seem to think this is a major drawback. I didn't say I would not like to see it run faster. But considering the alternatives, working correctly all the times at the current speed seems to cover my more typical uses a lot better. > No worries. I'm mulling over the idea to release 2.3.0 this week > without the new ACL handling code to get the latest fixes out of the > door first and push this stuff into a 2.4.0 release in November. As long as you keep reminding us which snapshot has the new ACL handling code, that is OK with me. I will want to push out the snapshot in a week or two and remove some of my workarounds for ACL corrections and/or noacl mounted directories in order to see if these things are working now for real. >>> Given the above result, I'm wondering if we can afford using AuthZ at >>> all. OTOH I don't see any other way to get the correct POSIX permissions >> >from a non-Cygwin ACL :( >> >> If you really want fast but incorrect there's always the "noacl" mount >> option. > > Right. OTOH, maybe we could enhance the "acl" mount option? > > "acl" -> "quickacl" -> "noacl"? Let's worry about that middle ground scenario when the ACL code has proven itself. The danger here is that the edge cases that will make problems are not easy to spot before you run into them -- Achim. (on the road :-) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple