DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=bkbnE8
	BwV7/1w61la7mseVTEo69eb5jUyYiljuDFQStTpBJJw7pIfVj5JwChnIrlJBQC1F
	WON1YVngaoDVob+xT3iABcgUSl+/x8ubtdVaeojS1tJusHdOJMyhsoutMDjip3Ye
	bOHwg93VXh2GSk6U9gSWI93kSSty1sIFz2oKw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <562C6940.1050404@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:31:44 +0800
From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:25.4) Gecko/20150524 FossaMail/25.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: problems with to_string not declared in this scope
References: <BN3PR03MB14323D6B1DD4FE6AE80F0A55C2250 AT BN3PR03MB1432 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <CAOC2fq-ZhoyhdByQ8+Q64Wf_FjYQpD1VKvZ-PR9buCNXVEBJgg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOC2fq-ZhoyhdByQ8+Q64Wf_FjYQpD1VKvZ-PR9buCNXVEBJgg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BTNT5qvjfNT5UB4SdoVRIrxQDiSn8M5xp"

--BTNT5qvjfNT5UB4SdoVRIrxQDiSn8M5xp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10/25/2015 01:00, Michael Enright wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Luong Hoang wrote:
>> The error says 'to_string' was not declared in this scope
>=20
> Lack of developer attention in the related project newlib. I googled
> this myself a couple of weeks ago. Apparently if you start to work on
> that you pull in a lot of other little missing tasks including
> actually writing the string conversion piece for some of the wider
> scalar types.
>=20
> https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2015-01/msg00049.html is near the
> message you reference but I couldn't tell if it was the same thread.
>=20
> I sometimes wonder what would be involved in fixing this.
>=20

Full C99 *printf support. Corinna answered on the same thread
https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2015-01/msg00245.html


--BTNT5qvjfNT5UB4SdoVRIrxQDiSn8M5xp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=tNYD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BTNT5qvjfNT5UB4SdoVRIrxQDiSn8M5xp--