X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=J6V 7T63CING4bR4pWfpnY8KqRrFJW9rH1/dGzfKq/66jrQQzmO2k9XHjmEqnvb3H08G VKe93sqUr03KMbIOM5hFhpIKqa5zl8O1TfyRCuVnBIqc0ECygef02oCbzgd4tWK5 NQSB7zPIQ4ZgDAJs+0OI99c+HZzdYiAjfqtVWvsU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=CGItThWGb Hl2IsiX55QoepMJHYI=; b=SB0xe/ybne6Qdal8AROeiRo+X6Dau+cbOZIEDBk3N l35Gx8Glb+ulvtGkSfVxRE8IJrpUIFEYC68FgopmhLvxpRdmb6HM2OenSFT2PMcG JleLl/QTYhr2Vg4PvW8QoccIWLtozRzBrJnmNf1GvaK7RzRoex6gvg8nAkEhf8R4 ms= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.der-appit.de To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Frank Redeker Subject: Missing volumes in output from df -h Message-ID: <56279E3E.7010908@der-appit.de> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:16:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello list, I just noticed 2 missing volumes when executing df -h from inside [CYGWIN_NT-6.1 Mimir 2.2.1(0.289/5/3) 2015-08-20 11:42 x86_64 Cygwin] $ mount D:/Program_Files_64/cygwin64/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto) D:/Program_Files_64/cygwin64/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto) D:/Program_Files_64/cygwin64 on / type ntfs (binary,auto) B: on /cygdrive/b type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) D: on /cygdrive/d type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) E: on /cygdrive/e type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) F: on /cygdrive/f type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) M: on /cygdrive/m type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) N: on /cygdrive/n type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) O: on /cygdrive/o type smbfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) P: on /cygdrive/p type smbfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) T: on /cygdrive/t type ntfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) W: on /cygdrive/w type smbfs (binary,posix=0,user,noumount,auto) The volumes B: and T: are no real drives but created with subst. $ subst B:\: => F:\Projects T:\: => F:\T $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on D:/Program_Files_64/cygwin64 112G 42G 70G 38% / B: 469G 84G 386G 18% /cygdrive/b C: 115G 87G 29G 76% /cygdrive/c E: 463G 215G 249G 47% /cygdrive/e M: 233G 72G 161G 31% /cygdrive/m N: 230G 143G 87G 63% /cygdrive/n O: 856G 751G 105G 88% /cygdrive/o P: 285G 181G 105G 64% /cygdrive/p W: 209G 179G 30G 86% /cygdrive/w $ df -h /cygdrive/f Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on F: 469G 84G 386G 18% /cygdrive/f When executing df from inside my old [CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 Mimir 1.7.33-2(0.280/5/3) 2014-11-13 15:45 i686 Cygwin] the result is somewhat different. Here drive B: and F: are missing but T: is present. $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on C: 115G 87G 29G 76% /cygdrive/c T: 469G 84G 386G 18% /cygdrive/t D: 112G 42G 70G 38% /cygdrive/d E: 463G 215G 249G 47% /cygdrive/e M: 233G 72G 161G 31% /cygdrive/m N: 230G 143G 87G 63% /cygdrive/n O: 856G 751G 105G 88% /cygdrive/o P: 285G 181G 105G 64% /cygdrive/p W: 209G 179G 30G 86% /cygdrive/w Frank I tried to report this from my registered mailing list account f.redeker (at) razorcat.de. But that mail was rejected because of spam classification. Maybe this happend because of the attached cygcheck and strace output. If the cygcheck and strace is needed to find out what going on I will try send it again. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple