X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=anA2tPqaJzxrR62/
	LZv490yGA7EKnBq1Xo2btB6mXQr5Zdf28HsUhNXAKxr0F/VX3gfyc1PMjzxDbCZw
	C+U9XT8SMTTuATEo2YG6IdlUcRybJn7tKFkWFMmr9C7j1NJ6cjYxX/nf4kgrAOgB
	9/xN6GniMBSjDu7jjRS1QIItVNg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Av5ELfVp/KOoikHGY5ru0k
	Bgv4k=; b=xOLYgB1YRAc8bPPFYwrOzGM/qdv/kiFBMwYF+YrfMkJrdBGJIcuVrI
	qZhoOoI9AKUgt8R6CPQ5znBwVmXFMf4Yj+DA259Iy5Io2sTzalYqh4FDz882xaIj
	cwwA2W9NnVhBZEC0o+WtPWXz3BYQabvuEsiDuBvzN1knYX4CXLyq0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: limerock04.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already.
Subject: Re: How to correctly rebase?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Rainer DOT Woitok AT gmail DOT com
References: <22046 DOT 25592 DOT 311399 DOT 765933 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com> <8925F252-F479-4990-B568-1EC612DF39A5 AT etr-usa DOT com> <22047 DOT 42793 DOT 36600 DOT 773496 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com> <41C9E795-AEEC-4378-8548-44DAF7DB98E7 AT etr-usa DOT com> <5620164E DOT 1010508 AT cornell DOT edu> <22048 DOT 47638 DOT 206600 DOT 117271 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com> <5620F460 DOT 7020605 AT cornell DOT edu> <562112CE DOT 4040407 AT cornell DOT edu> <22051 DOT 32540 DOT 675000 DOT 621396 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com>
From: Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
Message-ID: <5623944A.3090809@cornell.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:44:58 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <22051.32540.675000.621396@woitok.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 10/18/2015 7:14 AM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Ken and Others,
>
> On Friday, 2015-10-16 11:07:58 -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>
>> On 10/16/2015 8:58 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> ...
>>> As Warren and Achim have both suggested, you may just have too many DLLs for
>>> 32-bit Cygwin.
>
> Just to make sure: Are we talking  about Windows and Windows application
> DLLs PLUS Cygwin and  Cygwin application DLLs?   Or are we  just talking
> about Cygwin and Cygwin application DLLs?

Just Cygwin and Cygwin application DLLs.

>>>                  Can you uninstall some unneeded packages?
>
> I'm sure I can.  In the course of  using Cygwin I've installed plenty of
> packages and  have also uninstalled  some again.   And each  package in-
> stalled has also  installed all the packages  it depends on,  while each
> package deinstalled has naturally left all its dependees on my system.
>
> Question:  is there some command  line tool which lists all dependencies
> for a given package?   I could then  write a small  shell script to find
> out the list of  packages which are not  required by any  other package.
> And if I then  find packages  in this list  which I don't  require, too,
> I've found some candidates ...

Install the cygcheck-dep package and use the script /usr/bin/cygcheck-dep.

>>>                                                             Or switch to 64-bit
>>> Cygwin?
>
> Well, it's a bit strange: the hardware in fact IS 64 bit,  but the Vista
> running on it is 32 bit,  because this laptop  is a convertible and some
> of the tablet  specific drivers,  for instance for the stylus,  were (at
> least five years ago) only available as 32  bit versions.  So the quest-
> ion is:  what does 64 bit Cygwin require?   Only any Windows on a 64 bit
> hardware or a 64 bit Windows on a 64  bit hardware?   I suspect it's the
> latter ...

Yes, I think so.

>>> By the way, I don't think you have yet attached cygcheck output as requested in
>>> http://cygwin.com/problems.html:
>
> You are right.  That was mainly because my initial problem wasn't of the
> kind "What's wrong with my Cygwin installation?"  but rather of the kind
> "What's wrong with my way to rebase my Cygwin DLLs?".  I've appended the
> output below,  and I really hope  you're right,  and somebody  will spot
> something there ...

In the future, please follow the instructions, which say to send the cygcheck 
output as an *attachment*.  This is to avoid bogus hits when people search the 
archives.

The only things that jump out at me are the ZoneAlarm warning (which you already 
know about) and the fact that you do indeed have a large number of packages 
installed.

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple