X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Sxlr6UfFz5MYSB9P
	NCf54bRJKpmykWfXRxyj2wUIIY2JOrqf5Flls4yVyRECVrCpybqinxkPdkQHHQZf
	vf6WDzaYDI7j9UHoJFVFp40TtbZ9ohIiErtPXGe6S/DAaOdCKF4zEQW67N48x2jA
	9kHgjtNNk9mlJldA9pHg8AeZosA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=9ugXfGJCKxOUu0yVVmdfRq
	qlJQQ=; b=E+2+pWa3+/XiojnZ6KSIQyH92yz94/lVvNE1wPXJwsjfTFsasKqTbv
	PGYCGzMiY1Yvd7TUZB4Bc8NR2eWApw4n7ZByKzHM1FBkyO8PxHaOQY+f7JL5IimO
	SL8FYv7nqblEkkpFjRr5pHRqJk1TisIk4tvKDoenweK7VsLCie8fY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: limerock01.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already.
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-5.2.0-1 (Test x86/x86_64)
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 560BC46D DOT 3060500 AT gmail DOT com> <5612C748 DOT 1070002 AT cornell DOT edu> <5613A488 DOT 1040206 AT gmail DOT com>
From: Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
Message-ID: <5613C926.9070806@cornell.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:14:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5613A488.1040206@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 10/6/2015 6:38 AM, JonY wrote:
> Yes, I am aware that something weird is going on in the x86 binutils but
> can't seem to pin it down anywhere. gcc builds hang when using the new
> nm (or perhaps build very very slowly).
>
> I'd be interested on your findings.

OK, I've started a new thread for this, since it doesn't seem to be 
related to gcc-5:

   https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-10/msg00060.html

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple