X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=lJ8pZJdpOGY41QkfufANtL4mtvTYBCg2Zs6ZlznOAD0 3JcogknJsitTcdjcUjUrAhuVduzPg5k0OK0yVOviZuTEcTtYZd6q+vcKVaU9tfhc wFlcUzGcK+z18WDM1QsjJNdv6bq9kSsmgI/61GUKlTlUNjS4xUfS/16L3lMaLaj4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=366hbau726wqIniUPVAbAZxlneA=; b=dkK0YTB3NReVR01YF ulUQR/I8y+tDz4nyvsSHXTQkaxW8jgEveg6FC1IOlOciSwDfVGKUpa2usODPxHWz j1gXowAjWizEf4//7xMn2JU08wBYknGc8aKi5W2PlzrTWG5ow86yhXFrjTJGGCv0 Fni/MfNMz9TqxqajjL6o0t7BGo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <1443776288.8896.3.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: [Cygwin-ports-general] Ncview From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 03:58:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <560DA71F.2060006@gmail.com> References: <56095DBC DOT 6090308 AT gmail DOT com> <1443720905 DOT 8588 DOT 17 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <560DA71F DOT 2060006 AT gmail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 23:35 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 01/10/2015 19:35, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 17:33 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >> On 28/09/2015 16:07, Vasileios Anagnostopoulos wrote: > > >> > >> 2) the 64 bit crashes inside X libs. > >> I never succeeded to identify the root cause > > > > Confirmed. Often 64-bit-only issues come down to one or more of the > > following: > > > > * implicit function declarations. Per the C standard, argument types > > are assumed to match whatever is given (which may be wrong if e.g. 0 is > > used instead of 0L or (PointerType)0 or NULL etc.) and the return type > > is assumed to be int (which will truncate the actual return value when > > it is actually a long/pointer). > > This is not. The only two implicit declaration are of type int > and declaring them changes noting. > > > > > * vararg types. Because these types aren't declared, the compiler can't > > automatically cast values to the correct type, so literal values and > > symbolic constants must be explicitly cast if they are not meant to be > > an int and are not obviously a long/pointer. > > I don't find any case. The XtVa* functions use varargs. > > In the case of ncview, I strongly suspect the latter should anyone be > > interested in fixing this. > > The hard issue is that only cygwin 64 bit seems impacted, > while other 64 platform are fine, > and that the crash is well deep X libraries during the > destruction phase of graphical elements > as the X graphics elements are not correctly destroyed in sequence. > > If someone more knowledgeable in X is interested I can provide the > program and a test case. That would be great. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple