X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=oVqy iisAsxIZngVcgBBEein5PqsTXUitgLunH7/mKeb+pqwaVJkwX+AEH4QVV6YA5qxG BFgwO2rpVJ8o0ZhbkoQgp5hR+RCsOONVqhj9sJsM/fNf4UoU1zmtypy+eFJPf8x3 IoKHuFLoEm/EHOXgOjlokxBfuzGlfoln0BXG3J8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=6f9h+DowuC M9mi1sBLKgG+5mnA4=; b=nojLVz10uMjlVMtEaoNZQfxULf3V6mtHWBg67rTLJ6 MbebBX0L9Lebs54KU6UOwq5UioDWXHcsHCuZRn7wF6nF4PsE72GVQmRqLDIkrceX 8UNStINHwe2UiQ4x5LJH6U2yAlejrZxk2gxqHunmz7cz6+CrDrXliXs8D3j9hN7n w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: Group Permissions on root folders problem (Windows 10 TP build 10061) To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20150616155843 DOT GE31537 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150905155916 DOT 8403bea8d4f631c1f7a314e3 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20150906114444 DOT GA27066 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150910200439 DOT bf06449af4f1e6efcb76676e AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20150910172348 DOT GB26699 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <55F1BD86 DOT 1090001 AT redhat DOT com> <20150910173128 DOT GD26699 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> From: Eric Blake Openpgp: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Message-ID: <55F1BF8A.2050907@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:36:10 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150910173128.GD26699@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fGXDgxG1Q8GQNkHMX84FK1KSvLIPim65G" X-IsSubscribed: yes --fGXDgxG1Q8GQNkHMX84FK1KSvLIPim65G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/10/2015 11:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> - if [ "\\\\${COMPUTERNAME,,*}" !=3D "${LOGONSERVER,,*}" ] >>>> + if [ "\\\\${COMPUTERNAME,,*}" !=3D "${LOGONSERVER,,*}" \ >>>> + -a "${LOGONSERVER}" !=3D "\\\\MicrosoftAccount" ] >>>> then >>>> # Lowercase of USERDOMAIN >>>> csih_PRIVILEGED_USERNAME=3D"${COMPUTERNAME,,*}+${username}" >>> >>> Thanks a lot, much appreciated. Patch applied. >> >> [ ... -a ... ] is not portable; there are some inherently ambiguous >> situations that it cannot handle. POSIX recommends that you spell it [ >> ... ] && [ ... ] instead. >=20 > Does this matter in this very situation? This is always running under > bash, btw. Bash's a requirement for the csih helper script. Because you are at least using bash, you will get consistent behavior; and because both ... are 3-argument tests, it is unlikely that one of the tests can be confused with other operators like '(' or ')'. So, I guess it's okay to leave it alone here. But even with bash, the use of -a can cause problems when testing user-supplied variables that might happen to expand to text that looks like potential operators. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --fGXDgxG1Q8GQNkHMX84FK1KSvLIPim65G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV8b+KAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqFhIH/R3D3++p8kTs5FrenNToUreF dYzcjzrj1uxY3NcqZaFm9s7Msyc4/NVEwIWzKZ+p2p8nKh7ynB4+SDnXcHJekNNB 28xAM8F8KzCuV92tBX7COapy7UKRUxX7hi7GAt5TG4CtY7r3mXOquUF7WvLnTwOr eBk3eQQ2Uh/wzbIelBwt6qkY+iygnJUbGfiLWUcKKUrfnEC5D7hDHBVP4chOeqJC hgI5hsN1hcFJsnkEK2vAOZ+5BXYoMOI8ZW+uFCDkVeu+muwKNwmB9PnbJFoTWNcS k0jAOzWoQO+8+fQRLHwPIc0Y8Dca66Shx0gsNKJdko1ZXtrZTG/BRBio5HnatOg= =T8gK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fGXDgxG1Q8GQNkHMX84FK1KSvLIPim65G--