X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=Wpgg0QPeZ/tv5b2gqXpoKes1m7qLAbAghfd6aeT3Se8EKuZcPnd/o 7reSqqOU0L2uQdojEjRtFkNP3H4L+XYZcpv2e6Yn2fpRS0PIiKdDLFr7Jr6XoIiP OqXmy0r671DxpDzhxpFNZqkU2Be/AwhsjShx0j6IZVmnS/kcKrTNKQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=bxIogkXGfkOizsj5/vfrYAvG5oQ=; b=Bs7i1j5rTtxDuCqUkJHojODdW80L vsFcRPZ2DJgb4dqbY+AFGNRAC+OD8JU5rv9XoZPyIE/hJ73l4E3j+aLdQWMepfuS moIP3DHpnXLBMOhxysWQM5I2c1jjzJmLgMCQBtMF0rKypx37cGg7JnHWMJv3s+jo AHv/Q8b/vHxXtas= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: why no gpg-agent for Cygwin? Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 06:31:58 -0400 Lines: 11 Message-ID: <2esiuat7dre4q0gjjv81ghh8n6q842kqhe@4ax.com> References: <20150904100308 DOT GA14466 AT dinwoodie DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:20:45PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > So, why isn't there a gpg-agent for Cygwin? Any hope of having one some > > day? > > I suspect simply because nobody has packaged one, and somebody has to do > the work to make it available. I doubt anyone would object to you > submitting an Intent To Package per https://cygwin.com/setup.html. If that's the only reason, I could certainly look at packaging it. I guess I'd like to hear from Marco first though, the gnupg maintainer, to tell us if there isn't some other reason. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple