X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=fLj8L98tEZf4wfXW
	jrchhCX0nFxip3XjssqJ+JMZnPKyfsrtIF+MWzAsFLVTjwh2P35JhMalXKaQ833k
	ewKyntR3CIjdRUgBbKcyjfUFxO0yNWa39WJeLbTsF+FHW6jjSWkPyjRxVmb6xN13
	egi2yBWXs/msU+ial5zN6DgIV+o=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=lr7KnbDdMU4CPrs/xKcBWf
	5lU3c=; b=FxC9JJpUncDmmv//mHupiuYyKerpUX8YHvYrffsOIUlvEThR6i6LJV
	/5QQmxHV/tdYSEFern+ltBR+T+J6tqjSwLI8QYqH9CXjy18XV4MBVRsrI2eiXUOL
	w0q3DTG8hkdccwlgay/QV6wpJZdglID1WGTdZfgvWCWXWmUut539w=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f173.google.com
X-Received: by 10.55.23.9 with SMTP id i9mr25916913qkh.22.1440875984066;        Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New: hexchat-2.10.2-2
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 1440795943 DOT 18308 DOT 24 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <55E198FF DOT 9030206 AT gmail DOT com> <1457379919 DOT 20150829212528 AT yandex DOT ru>
From: Mike DePaulo <mikedep333 AT gmail DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55E205CE.5060202@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:19:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1457379919.20150829212528@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08/29/2015 02:25 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Mike DePaulo!
> 
>> Compare XChat to OpenOffice: https://lwn.net/Articles/654776/ 
>> XChat is an important part of open source history, but that is
>> also what it is at this point in time.
> 
> https://lwn.net/Articles/655022/ That's a more correct link. LO was
> always a rip-off, and they dare claim they are "better". All this
> bitching is actually counterproductive and harmful to the
> community.

Sorry, I am not very knowledgeable on LO vs OO. I assumed that
Christian Schaller's judgment was correct.

But I am very knowledgeable about HexChat vs XChat. And I am confident
that HexChat has a future, while XChat does not.

- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlXiBcYACgkQIFy22CVQsit6NAD/XgrhO/KaiDoy1NpfdlQh+seU
hR6YD0C5Pr3O4TLL8p4A/1448ReRh81KcLgV5TCjk9V6dmwg7B5spND1Bt2uk1Ah
=eyCf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple