X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=cU0wrsp/ajGTMxXS 1bzjs9C0VrHvHvqCj1mYBYWZ5RuZfDiQtOmf/o2zjXEjYZcdHeCVozmC6OLPdR8d BeYQKdQAc8t9gS5wjScUuanzmKaXhNQ41i4ScGextqH07jJO+bXzxHA+Kta2pmIs tykhw6I0K+0+rBP/EWjqNbMJk8E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=QiDpD3/egq+wVO3dp5lgzH P72lk=; b=l9efsmDDLduP0Q2bAf4L51SfHbmSQj46bgpObQ2nYDAFilu4BF8qKp KLPS4fMno93eGhHRDiybkWbyc5mmxe7VkiTT2XyvW1urqzwepQxijYiUdNMkCl4S U33LBN0t/FXNy4lx9EdoYUEBP8Zba6UvP1EkfdUtM+8CZD8u+kjX8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_COUK,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2C2AQC0lN9V/9430lUNUa5bAQEBBpkUglMDAgKBeRABAQEBAQEBhS0BAQEDASNVBgsLGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgUAQ2wX3GGWIgoCIVsAQEBBwEBAQEegSKFBYU6hRIXglKBQwWVPYVthwaBSpUsg2uCMgMcgVWDPQEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2C2AQC0lN9V/9430lUNUa5bAQEBBpkUglMDAgKBeRABAQEBAQEBhS0BAQEDASNVBgsLGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgBAYgUAQ2wX3GGWIgoCIVsAQEBBwEBAQEegSKFBYU6hRIXglKBQwWVPYVthwaBSpUsg2uCMgMcgVWDPQEBAQ Subject: Re: Updated [test]: coreutils-8.24-2 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <001c01d0e04c$d8ebc210$8ac34630$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <000001d0e051$965f38a0$c31da9e0$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <55DE4B8B DOT 6000401 AT redhat DOT com> <55DF6961 DOT 9040804 AT dwalin DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk> <55DF7265 DOT 8050607 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Sam Edge X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55DF95F1.5080007@dwalin.fsnet.co.uk> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:57:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 27/08/2015 21:33, Helmut Karlowski wrote: > Did you mean: "The compiler-warning would inform you that the value is > not set in a code-path"? I'd agree if I was always in the position of starting projects from scratch. All compiler warnings should be errors and disabling a compiler warning has to have a valid justification during review, yes. But try it with an existing code base. That's when you need deterministic behaviour from your modifications with minimal disturbance to anything else. > That's why I usually try to avoid initializing auto-variables (and > maybe save some bytes). If you can afford the tech debt recovery time to change your compiler warnings to errors or sift through the build output - and prove to your QA/RA that you don't have to re-certify the product. But you're unlikely to save any bytes using a modern compiler. Anyway, we're off-topic so adieu. -- Sam Edge -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple