X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:to:subject:references:date
	:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id
	:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=tOqXfNCJp60hngRRvCqPbVz9pnlrb+
	LPn7jJhLc8otywBESnbSgWCltKh4pD8h21/ZMRKT+ksROIO7eIg0amrPcjsOTuUp
	mdp4UApO57qmwNnODnOMWzJXcyuAA+lGmZLWpWpzkVFyLszjWHTBwGEc1J477mvv
	qr5Alty/JXQ1A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:to:subject:references:date
	:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id
	:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=Uhdk6JkPh9hVrkAbb8iYxq+vpu0=; b=kEHi
	3qGGJIxtDGtxFUVxgs2gM15vx1X9Qqfy8jMJcwQu4VGn239cbBELnieY/sxvKAXN
	NPMIqFgSWMVcX0vHzO2oGqsLIz4xbEYQmUXNy4ieG5ZssDq7ZO9DF8jpVgdOODHy
	AA1qy4yJWGFUpLC9IDW49pNXgnGZusyc0H/nMXk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mailout.ish.de
X-Spam-Score: -1.426
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated [test]: coreutils-8.24-2
References: <001c01d0e04c$d8ebc210$8ac34630$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <000001d0e051$965f38a0$c31da9e0$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <55DE4B8B DOT 6000401 AT redhat DOT com> <55DF6961 DOT 9040804 AT dwalin DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk> <55DF7265 DOT 8050607 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 21:33:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut DOT karlowski AT ish DOT de>
Message-ID: <op.x31nexczofd6j1@nebbiolo.upc.de>
In-Reply-To: <55DF7265.8050607@lysator.liu.se>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32)
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Am 27.08.2015, 21:26 Uhr, schrieb Peter Rosin:

> Seems like a fast way to not get a compiler warning if you do happen
> to use a variable that would be used uninitialized if it were not for
> an ugly pointless initializer.

> Sorry if I added the wrong number of negations in there, but you get my
> point anyway, hopefully...

Did you mean: "The compiler-warning would inform you that the value is not  
set in a code-path"?

That's why I usually try to avoid initializing auto-variables (and maybe  
save some bytes).

-Helmut


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple