X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=eOPNWMqD5hmQ8A2u8ZeEyJXJegcuK
	DQAZak+7KjPsy6L3jKYMtRGL275ECzo1IMooxAORldxWEozkRPMBvTXavR3zD1Gi
	CuGNUWrIqqnj+WESaMpBNLKi9g5NaiKHp1J3cdUD8LjovLlabrZugmIFWQ/dMFeL
	CerUUcoSBF4nP0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=DLnkhlWYxaFDk7Jqpzbo3uyeIQQ=; b=TUY
	A6RySI9onbW+Kqkj354xEMtwX+PcW4DZDeTSNsodHGoQud/vTTJ0bqb/VhigxO3k
	tdrbwdIZ+mxbcUOL5BWcAAY71H7xyzAU6GqPHQttf5Ziwh3Ocsel8Wnhs8hJ3VSm
	CorLvH5l2Z5E1rTrQV0JHPlUQYgpjAGY18FU8AiA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: nihxway4out.hub.nih.gov
X-SBRS-Extended: Low
X-IronPortListener: Outbound_SMTP
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2GvBACqp9NV/4lHKJxdhF6DHsJgAhyBawEBAQEBAQR8C4QjAQEBBBIREVUCAQgYAgIGIAICAh0TFRACBBsaiAyxTYoyliABAQEBBgEBAQEBARyBIooxhFk4gmkvgRQFlSEBCodlhHyaLxcPg32COYEEAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2GvBACqp9NV/4lHKJxdhF6DHsJgAhyBawEBAQEBAQR8C4QjAQEBBBIREVUCAQgYAgIGIAICAh0TFRACBBsaiAyxTYoyliABAQEBBgEBAQEBARyBIooxhFk4gmkvgRQFlSEBCodlhHyaLxcPg32COYEEAQEB
From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" <BBuchbinder AT niaid DOT nih DOT gov>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: getent services enumeration glitch
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:49:23 +0000
Message-ID: <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA210A9A230@msgb09.nih.gov>
References: <loom DOT 20150818T113145-139 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150818112416 DOT GN17917 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20150818112416.GN17917@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t7ILncmc025398

Corinna Vinschen sent the following at Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:24 AM
>On Aug 18 09:40, Mark Geisert wrote:
>Congratulations! You found a 13 years old bug in Cygwin's getservent
>implementation, which returned the port number in host byte order
>instead of in network byte order for all this time. Makes me wonder how
>often getservent is used in the wild...

Not that I know what getent is, let alone having ever used it, shouldn't
finding a bug that old merit a gold star?

- Barry
  Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf of NIAID.