X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=s8xBXRBpQDJ9UQWiol8wwfRYTTyd5hMgv2iblQXjruVX96ZmMwo2g kwQW86LY6Y5vAdVUmMuWf46bmyLFxtXZ4ERtwaVdfvXRdaC5fxvIb9HXl+8UMFhN cErRXTSsZIssZ+q5Vh+6kqhKY+SqsVs99oJ4LrVJ17mdNzUqXbzr04= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=FbRBKPKPzuC3TtmtuvsuEtsE+PA=; b=QDykJ4yre0IbcwbORFHe1v/TFqVT ZJkkQcEBe+7k+KPnkOppDf9aTfuD3a1gXUwlHiXCKj1ZAz5rMF0LqLSSsBqizwo2 mkuUQdz5xNVA5SHMdAJIyrfL1qga5QVMaYDNoNmxYJp85NNJW7At4vmjCrZcy0yU 8pc2oSblGgvQx5M= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Mark Geisert Subject: Re: getent services enumeration glitch Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <20150818112416 DOT GN17917 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Corinna Vinschen writes: > On Aug 18 09:40, Mark Geisert wrote: > > $ getent services man > > man 9535/tcp > > > > $ getent services | grep man > > man 16165/tcp > > > Congratulations! You found a 13 years old bug in Cygwin's getservent > implementation, which returned the port number in host byte order > instead of in network byte order for all this time. Makes me wonder > how often getservent is used in the wild... > > Since I uploaded 2.2.1-0.2 just before your bug report, I quickly > created a new snapshot with the patch on https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > Please give it a try. > > Thanks, > Corinna The new snapshot solves the issue for me. I'll see if I can stumble upon a more substantial bug next time :) Cheers, ..mark -- captcha: schussing -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple