X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=E7sIbegwxhBoxL0qY82hqu0xtt6AUHH3YWZf4UedsEQHC7GmHaBx9
	wyhE+Hqq5Pqh6bvIlItxlDmBEfPwfKOD9dU/EwbZ1Kl20oCvqfZ2XXgfQjHqPIfu
	gGZBXamutdR/H4U0MqudRoKCMNLjT5x2ihD03fH31lvjpvqoUK6Sb0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=PAqhh4nvKwqzNI2JzfvB/6f7Tks=; b=nOpFKvXhWj51hf8UYSktUOcnOjqS
	q+ZjhsYSSMgWfONLiy8Y7xnXv1+NHfQcB0zqK6Rgff5mrNJn2/lq9W+CkFMxOuo7
	rrUC3MGFiNoIeMupuiChCkZHa2y6OKh4/lFKaG+0eBGYVon2H0zmPMIVDE2gOfLR
	JjeOju5qQ1rn1AU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:53:39 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Shares with strange ACL settings
Message-ID: <20150817145339.GG17917@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20150817104504 DOT GA18305 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150817T125001-15 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150817110344 DOT GB18305 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150817T130510-279 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150817113101 DOT GC18305 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150817113949 DOT GD18305 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150817T134217-757 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20150817T142110-402 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150817125618 DOT GC17917 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150817T150702-368 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20150817T150702-368@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 17 13:12, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:
>=20
> > No worries and thank you.  I just don't quite understand the stuff
> > returned by 8000001e and what I see above.
>=20
> Different architectures, so these are not expected to match.

Sure, I wasn't expecting that.  I referred to the cpuid output you
provided and the matching info from your OP starting this subthread.

> >  Do I understand this
> > correctly that a single CPU has 2 NUMA nodes?  Does that mean a single
> > HW socket consists of two independent 6 core CPUs?
>=20
> In the case above, yes.  MagnyCours is two Istanbul dies in one package.
>=20
> > Well, anyway, I just got remote access to a 2 socket systems with
> > Opteron 6386SE CPUs. It's installing rhel7 right now so I might get
> > another clue from there.
>=20
> Yes, that should help.  That's again two dies per package, each with 8
> processors paired inside 4 modules.  Each of the two die should be more or
> less identical to the 6328, save for clock frequency.

Indeed, looking into the output provided by the 6328SE and some 12 core
MagnyCours CPU I forgot the number of, was helpful.  I *think* I fixed
the cpuinfo now for new AMDs which provide 0x800001e topology info.

Please give the latest snapshot from https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
a try.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=X4iF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--