X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=TiZnN MhGUuPqQlNXrORVV8wgmP8zyKE6bsK0nDprT7nZ8TAgTb7RHARVCkIbyHIrEB2KD 3hme4cXg3I27a6sbIzR4fdTQ0u8C5KLaRVLbB2MdT7aa/OixIKHgUjiY7oBfjH34 OHNCHw/KLPBN3bZP+uJBTN5tKxZmQT6suLLz54= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=CY3p8z5NF9R i1wg0JbTs+r3w2eo=; b=QVRYFMPdBpQAH0naOfmfTGFzmArghkRSdOypWKTGpO1 6cU+eo6LvSCiuLRaCGHAUQ7E3dxNHrEUSdvv/vKrJf3/xpcHXtN+IYLW8Tr2VxxP Y9QsQ+r6JrI+JGOIhHtV0sIYEtlKn+Eiuey6IIq0+Z+51P3WWAVA/hqy8BHgrjfQ = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-in-16.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-11.arcor-online.net 3mtrfR0ln4z31mX From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shares with strange ACL settings References: <20150812155817 DOT GN13029 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <878u9g9y6b DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20150812183220 DOT GO13029 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87vbck8h92 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20150813163302 DOT GB28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150813175302 DOT GD28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150814082959 DOT GE28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150814134552 DOT GG28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87bne8d1tm DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20150815183126 DOT GT28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 21:04:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150815183126.GT28349@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Sat, 15 Aug 2015 20:31:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87vbcgbcg4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Corinna Vinschen writes: >> I've also tried to find out why the L3 cache is not reported for AMD in >> cpuinfo. It seems the reason is that it is logically part of the >> northbridge system, even if it is on-die and gets reported via CPUID. > > Ok, interesting. Still strange, isn't it? In any case, it's not due to an inability to get at the cache sizes. The code that fills those in has the sizes for all levels, but the cache size structure that gets used in /proc/cpuinfo is filled from L2 on AMD and L3 on Intel. If you need the full information on Linux you'd go to /sys/devices/system/cpu or use one of the more specialized programs that give you topology information anyway. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple