X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=b3xi7rN43wYSxHXQwrkCw1BLwDcZ
	pDu+WtCIaQaQAWvt0euZR1Yhva5XHT5JM8hmajbGoSKkAYt/SyMva5FlSa71NYAU
	e0OzqL0s6Y/dzAjzN7vn7MV//Mx8HJgKaSJ59diSDyYjpGHk11Kt8eD0SIzE151l
	QVERK5suqCKDcK8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; s=default; bh=u+XVISG+c3c0VI2fhGWiajanIX8=; b=IN
	IAq43GSlJs59ClQTQRsSMl2y8OyT1alMGf+eXhPr8Ey8TZ9ojhMH/MnEhxcCP1AQ
	OJZ47TCK49QtqzfRVqrIL0tiNoHo8uD2V7QNbWLix3cgyKAmfDtsh9eFAkD4gTVL
	GVz+yKfMJaP8vP532Am4s1mhsdW1BFowQy/IdP6Ys=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: etr-usa.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: Somebody having access to a Windows machine with > 64 CPUs?
From: Warren Young <wyml AT etr-usa DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <6E689F0D-F196-4D1B-B6FA-782A27AF936C@etr-usa.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:51:12 -0600
Message-Id: <7AB52D09-030B-4614-B90F-682B57E51A9E@etr-usa.com>
References: <20150810160011 DOT GC13029 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6E689F0D-F196-4D1B-B6FA-782A27AF936C AT etr-usa DOT com>
To: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7AGpcEY002286

On Aug 10, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> 
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>> 
>> for testing, I need somebody running a small test program on a machine
>> with more than 64 CPUs under Windows 7 or later.
> 
> I don’t think that’s possible today.  Windows 7 Professional…

Oh, I just saw your “or later” bit.

Unfortunately, I can’t find the Windows 10 EULA, and the usual primary sources don’t talk about processor/core limits at all.  Perhaps they have finally given up on such silly limits?

If so, then one could actually build a 65+ logical core Windows 10 box.
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple