X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=uOox48Uy9frZZIPUdTTlgzZ+eHTpLKAMGFpQxNbk3IeZgWyzF3xSu HbemJ/jP75Uu18SFHHKwBrry9QwufHG/IPZEe1jzLRfzIvzmrxT9Mq99Ca0f6iZU eezHHMBjF3dCuSWn5xuPmbo/s+VzfH6vs3sSOkmq/roi+46TXgMQq0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=XGNOz5lXM51hWJmQ4a+6vDVgYWE=; b=wmONEDnhJ1t1Q6BsXUJTo2b/Pius edeQibluouC1WgQM8tH951UBAsAdZhoWv1DPzW9iIa+W0eYTN4XwHCTgGXVkWhiq BflL17Y0DSULbT88uTu/eN7iamfJ3M4LhtNClu1sHXV1bsOwUaUlnOuGpjWr3f36 DF+lV79PWU1j/mM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: cygwin cygwin.com Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Nicholas Clark gmail.com> writes: > I remember seeing a bunch of traffic on the subject of rebasing a few > years ago, with people saying that it wouldn't be necessary once we > moved over to 64-bit Cygwin. Did that wind up being true? Rebasing is still done on both 32bit and 64bit, but it's automatic now. As long as you don't install things around setup, you should not need to care. > I've got some in-house tools that some of our developers want to use > on Cygwin, and I've been thinking about the best way to maintain > remote installations. If I use some kind of scripted > deployment/update, do I actually need to keep everything rebased? See above. As long as you package your inhouse stuff so that setup installs it along with the rest of Cygwin, you don't need more than a wrapper around the call to setup. Regards, Achim. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple