X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=XSMD4pWav3Fjn3l9
	LRCu72a2l+LlUS1lFPicqyhCY/jFa8UrdKp2aoJdenS8qHuiviZlvxyu+O8JW846
	JVQ53cgpxXxMp7wLkR5klkCjR1bMNTrG1YBnYJxEs/gli2koBYgjrsAW5llEhdIt
	hM4PhR81Nmt7og9Z8V4Y7xj+Otc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=oh5WX6hXyl5zSJsMZ8itC3
	ORs6c=; b=DlYzSWbXvRhiMpP3JZsfEK7+IJyC+KcFDNOo7ETbBaQwJYjxJbQvZq
	n6GSWcnyHItGr8f6R3AzaRU/LwgzucAH8WQhew71UsJzFn80VKLLAC+Y2HnCXbDQ
	Kg9nA9ZydbK33Slbu179qS/2CoFLdIiNFP0rkQQuTWL3JBW/sIgqA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:16:44 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <168268631.20150803221644@yandex.ru>
To: Nicholas Clark <nicholas DOT clark AT gmail DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <CAKNeuBrRbQXfQJE7SGAAuK3s7ff-hcghu9tv39==O_ktJz33_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKNeuBrRbQXfQJE7SGAAuK3s7ff-hcghu9tv39==O_ktJz33_w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Nicholas Clark!

> I remember seeing a bunch of traffic on the subject of rebasing a few
> years ago, with people saying that it wouldn't be necessary once we
> moved over to 64-bit Cygwin. Did that wind up being true?

I see no reason to think otherwise. 64*bit address space is much leaner on the
subject.
However, the very process of rebasing the applications has nothing to do with
platform specs.
Apps are built on different machines, and their address space may collide,
when they meet on one target system.
64-bit platform just offer more space, meaning that more applications can be
installed that rely on POSIX address space semantics.
Still, you should only install what you are actually using.

> I've got some in-house tools that some of our developers want to use
> on Cygwin, and I've been thinking about the best way to maintain
> remote installations. If I use some kind of scripted
> deployment/update, do I actually need to keep everything rebased?

setup.exe offer all the tools you need for automatic installation.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Monday, August 3, 2015 22:12:38

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple