X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Rl/sFk23vK7sk6Td EVYIn9mkVU2kDpO6mlwogMmE2H3BVLy1bODbt+/gsn9EeKMJPTwTbx7xhRieoFi1 7KqcjWa2bPkZvZvux/V9b/NUBtfoqdXy5tPbAkcAW0IRM0qF0bwdRXrzKf/Lxhj+ hTxhuDTEGsqH9h5WLVIwxHRCv2c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=SSdETyEmAQRGvZduniEqxq qzZXg=; b=Y4kHqfNVozLLIm4gx7TMFayEYzMjeEi9jSCH2HIRC+Qhqi0diWuaap dv37hRpCA/lZcevvXCXmhblLIKywn81y2lkdL5gMBLuz1MmrKNL2JJBZKXwFPKCL cxkkEXPJFpfnvlfaai9//DNmbE9/iVD8qHqA1clGIuY3puFZ2R09A= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 15:19:24 +0300 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <1171686268.20150801151924@yandex.ru> To: Jim Reisert AD1C , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MinTTY 2.1.3 update breaks interoperability with ConEmu In-Reply-To: References: <55BB5FA7 DOT 9020404 AT yahoo DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Jim Reisert AD1C! >> Please disregard this post. Checking the changelog reveals that this is >> caused by a new feature, and can be overridden with the -d (--nodaemon) >> switch. > Why isn't the old behavior the default (spawn one process), with the > new feature being *enabled* by the -d switch? Wouldn't "-daemon" also > make more sense than "-nodaemon"? Had the same question. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Saturday, August 1, 2015 15:19:17 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple