X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=dS yyAUSwvr50UYGBJpDJOB4vb4vx9qWo77Xo/AMB54YkF134LT8y7u+sAJoEK/Oxtc 536kxAKgapZzAINGelcILjCIZbi87CrNpFdBmcjjf0MppSF0i6PzqxtrBts2gtga wvkB6NT246l58K85s6wmmXffgIX+8sfM2IxntE1N0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=o1njSMFI wJP5l6EKQsgikOazpF4=; b=yrHkOdA75MK09ixKKIeIjjhmnBMNc+G4bdxG3855 j95HuLQ84Z+l3HrFI1JF4TRLh0BYeEmsLc0+1+IoGEf6Yzzd4S03ZnqgWa88Ucr8 ewSMlS9Nw7mGNi5OtENVBCIuDXWqAXhdPDe61peMI87zPfc76C34nD39mcDRhJuT DNU= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.136.146 with SMTP id s18mr10263677ioi.25.1438396088208; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:28:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55BB5FA7.9020404@yahoo.com> References: <55BB5FA7 DOT 9020404 AT yahoo DOT com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:28:08 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MinTTY 2.1.3 update breaks interoperability with ConEmu From: Jim Reisert AD1C To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes > Please disregard this post. Checking the changelog reveals that this is > caused by a new feature, and can be overridden with the -d (--nodaemon) > switch. Why isn't the old behavior the default (spawn one process), with the new feature being *enabled* by the -d switch? Wouldn't "-daemon" also make more sense than "-nodaemon"? -- Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple