X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=skcoNirgsJ2W4J71s/e4O5ob4AWDNGZSzGU0F0q3VAdKDV6QdXwnH IeXWGcI3LTBGwztRa8AwrwN60XZXTAAqjo9tW0IU3tAX28zQoApuq268JYRyd2fb 2Iw2DqcyOXnK7OvbgyRvZ/fFUdlm1ncLosV8L5wMRIDSPejQ47ySJE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=aj1Le3ZY39aD/k72kLyh2h3U18c=; b=F11AWov5sOnhf4Gdo6MHxh49HQz8 Xvwjzjf1ScDxmAQsAMqzQF+TVQqGAvuyTgLvfGPqy79VNXpRUKAXfCarc+6RxH5O XBzeC2T7BGIp+ulblaIUonxWfQ/Iv9qyAUcnSB5qmHlAJCVg8nRNZKQFbgftF+EH W0cJC1mnf89+/ZM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Mcafee e'prise false positive on (x86) texlive-collection-fontsrecommended? Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <55B7413D DOT 1040308 AT shaddybaddah DOT name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Shaddy Baddah shaddybaddah.name> writes: > Is this a false positive on the part of the Virus Scanner? Or, as the > package is dated from before the vulnerability report, does the package > need an update? My guess is that it's a false positive. The scanner likely deletes all OTF fonts not explicitly whitelisted since it'd be hard to figure out during scan if the font triggers the bug (much less if it provides any malicious behaviour). Please report to McAfee. Regards, Achim. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple