X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:cc:from :message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=JPa8MwXt4uqy58YM S4rVk9KEIhZ9sQNvOc3TRgJyg97pBSO0qkyEtV5N9TZ7QTNuFIzk2g7KaV+CJmAZ FxCS2N/UpMjXNOhAw8mbPGH7aLTG74fMHVoO7tokMOvN0EneVy15KvTxpBQKZnXI Qfemc/4ck22Ikc+TPtYQWep8ol0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:reply-to:cc:from :message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=glexk/dW99ZCptP2ptmL51 kdXLE=; b=m2WahRktcJXTSGiuj0NkZ7iA+D6dAkWnSEzYm3QVa/rbCgFvEASDVy IkwUFeawd9FQXIFgE/pEfCLomddnaT9fWqT1ByYvyaEBG1/951PXLcUtRX5A9cay +v++ifzQf0n4kDqtlB3anJ1o5ZWoUJPBDOXet2hLttlVRJl5ozjhE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out1-smtp.messagingengine.com Subject: Re: Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <201507201914 DOT PAA11490 AT Stone DOT Rodents-Montreal DOT ORG> <55AE53E3 DOT 3080406 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <201507211436 DOT KAA17277 AT Stone DOT Rodents-Montreal DOT ORG> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Mouse From: Jon TURNEY Message-ID: <55B232D1.60409@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:42:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201507211436.KAA17277@Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 21/07/2015 15:36, Mouse wrote: >>> In FAQ item 1.9, [...] >>> Surely those list addresses shouldn't _all_ be the same...? >> This piece of text obviously doesn't make much sense after the >> search-and-replace which happened when the cygwin-xfree list was >> deprecated. > > Ah! I wondered how that had happened. Makes perfect sense now. > Though, I do note, the new wording makes it sound as though cygwin@ is > specifically for Cygwin/X, rather than all of Cygwin. As a strawman > for a fix, how about > > Not for Cygwin/X specifically, but Cygwin/X traffic is > appropriate for the main Cygwin list at cygwin@.... > >>> 12.8. Isn't "XWin" trademarked by StarNet Communications? > >>> No. A quick search at the United States Patent and Trademark >>> Office for "XWin" [...] >>> The question does not specify a jurisdiction; [...] >> I don't know why this is in the FAQ. It seems to record the >> discussion at [1]. > > It does, it does indeed. I did a few searches against the archives, > but must have missed the search terms which would have turned up that > one. (Not surprising; my search-fu is quite weak.) > >> How would you suggest rewriting this? > > It could be as simple as changing the answer to something like > > Not in the USA, at least; a quick search at... I've adjusted the FAQ text in those areas. Thanks for your comments. -- Jon TURNEY Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple