X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=LCWNVblPHh8VkJTVYxXqQZi08C5FISfGk878yAT4Oor36QuWLULbH
	Dc5pSAc6mkei1odWRuu2uMEtFNuvieYAbOGKDt/wMRDLCJk4ScB+XgeSNTuupYzd
	oQywKJ4R77AGJTcLHaTM5oE9iiuDjZ7NMHnX/Ceeu5IfMJJeDB3DJk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	 bh=YU0RLqkiJqzl/LtnDcd62MakcRw=; b=wZWDLRAnwhBsOrPomL84hx2wY5dy
	OJP0aPgYie6wfxiHxcTV/DgPQYgLiNdv/YxAlxT1T71VkH/eeYJaDcOb7CVjTwSQ
	vsdxO1szBzIDvCEjzzkZaaODVsFi+wcNmyvhZ9ga2RPKF0jWpA+00emqQCvfDNt1
	IBhikoCjI/QcLqk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BASE64_LENGTH_79_INF,BAYES_50,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: plane.gmane.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT NexGo DOT DE>
Subject: Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <loom.20150609T131400-840@post.gmane.org>
References: <CAJ1KOAidxNn99KCUNHCbGCvOc=51vz8uzo5zag_0FEYj-yyFPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150608124159 DOT GE3005 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150608132103 DOT GJ3005 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJ1KOAiz8rV33jmCuLHj9pkLBD+3w3N+7+eEQ6cZwScAkcsNyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJ1KOAh5Sqy2Zhag=zddULcZFTa759uyr4uXY_7QGhv85w_2Og AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150608154334 DOT GA13266 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150608T180517-501 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150608171813 DOT GA15150 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150609T085643-315 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150609095847 DOT GA3416 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t59BJ72c003820

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:
> That requires to update procps and cygwin packages at the same time.

I thought the raison d'être was that procps, by using the /proc interface,
would not be intertwined with the kernel anymore... I didn't suggest to move
it into another package, btw: the procps package should just be in the Base
group to ensure it is in all installs.

> It also replaces a ps using internal functionality with a ps which
> uses the /proc emulation layer, which *is* slower.

I can't think of a problem created by that fact (which doesn't mean that
none exist).

> What about patching Cygwin's ps to add the required functionality?
> SHTDI, of course...

Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough
for Linux anyway.
:-)


Regards,
Achim.