X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=k2Vzv nyQaNKC98NJ2/N5eAGnCNwpthz+StmUqw+Go+xAkLVQvNqok7C2tNyt3gz0t1M1P E+oxYaWdk7a1wSp1RGHzjek0n08r95W31H5WzU+hPHrwPF0sEZXJNs4VGrO1jlXR qXWmLIsOSWXJuv0hun/dPkCMCqb7fl0ZtAauFE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=4VWufoeHeSG AGgKxHNdFwo+drq4=; b=XdFHIWMacG8JSzswGS9Jgd3JMI+uSGrvr/SgwuLhsvj 1kP0yWvq/tkxiQombT9x6NYF1sJiEGxlQW/743pI+5XB0noSOWqXkNdME0FrFrDk y5EpUW+grkPzvBdet6WTX6Y6mjlU+Z8iqvesgje4JkzPJ/M/bE28XEKxb5vdMI+8 = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-in-04.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-01.arcor-online.net 3m0hR81hsrz2ljw From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mintty project References: <556B79E7 DOT 8070700 AT towo DOT net> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:14:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <556B79E7.8070700@towo.net> (Thomas Wolff's message of "Sun, 31 May 2015 23:15:19 +0200") Message-ID: <87pp5fl827.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Thomas Wolff writes: > I'd like to discuss what you (cygwin maintainers and others) think of > this move, whether it's good for mintty to be hosted on > github. The first thing should really be to find out what Andy Koppe thinks about this, or is there any information about his whereabouts that says he's abandoned his project (other than the long silence)? And that question of yours is moot since mintty already is on GitHub, in 26 different forks. Most of them are "Automatically exported from Google Code." and some not even fully up-to-date. Then closest to Cygwin is the one from cygwinports (Yaakov). Two of them simply dropped the history and only three of them have non-trivial commits. > Personally I feel that a platform like sourceforge provides a > more professional project environment which would provide more > confidence in stable project development. > What do you think? Sourceforge has been deteriorating for at least the last two years and personally I don't like the lock-in that GitHub tries to sneak upon its users. I certainly won't register with GitHub just for reporting an issue in one of their projects. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple