X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=kpZ6yo8bKpRIwgOQajHCpjmsSTdWb3Eyl
	cZqX0UYDJEt9XWCn7BCaLz5eYD7cqhn5It+UVwsTB6IFO/HhR2vtJqK1WymxY17D
	BTLdgRAHTl34+O90gPxURDIA/iL7Br4+IkiNiT0IUSETn95tXVhQuivbkllRhYlS
	3gX0K8AGt8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:reply-to; s=default; bh=ouNo44FWw92E+Xy9E72bMxGxqcs=; b=Mg4CsCt
	bEFy7QxFplI6y/cx48TwMepnDVYKORSfuzSXxMP2w2kFhQiDL0b+Exdg8zBBbI1b
	iCqVgiqu94t1goOVFkt+ptoBxYSN9XQWQR1kPufHBlm5WQXqnRTajQ4X3QJSaQV/
	7/8Ch0Mbr3/J5CdEaOkht9YGZDdQSAD0mrWk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net
Message-ID: <5563C4AD.4040608@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:56:13 -0700
From: David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: apr: enable threads?
References: <1432236172 DOT 5064 DOT 4 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <555E3F58 DOT 7020302 AT acm DOT org> <1432241358 DOT 3296 DOT 4 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <555E643D DOT 5080108 AT acm DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <555E643D.5080108@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/21/2015 4:03 PM, David Rothenberger wrote:
> Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:26 -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>>> I am looking at upgrading Apache httpd to 2.4, and it is clear that this
>>>> has not even attempted to be built with an APR without threads support.
>>>> While I may be able to get it to compile as-is, I have serious concerns
>>>> that it will not operate as designed, particularly wrt mod_proxy.
>>>>
>>>> What exactly is blocking the enablement of threads support in APR?
>>>
>>> The last time I tried it, the tests for subversion failed when threads
>>> were turned on in APR.
>>
>> Would you mind trying again, and let's see if we can work out any
>> issues?  The fact that httpd won't build cleanly with APR threads
>> disabled makes me worry that nobody is really supporting this
>> configuration anymore.
>>
>> Also, this would seem to indicate that we're missing something in
>> apr-util:
>>
>> configure: WARNING: Your APR does not include SSL/EVP support. To enable
>> it: configure --with-crypto
> 
> Sure, I'll add it to my list of things to do, but it may take a while
> since (1) I'm very busy working 6 days a week for real job and (2)
> running the subversion tests is difficult.

I've uploaded new versions of libapr1, libaprutil1, and subversion.
libapr1 is built with threads and the subversion tests appear to pass,
or at least fail in the same way as with a libapr1 without threads.

I rebuilt libaprutil1 with the --with-crypto flag, although I'm pretty
sure it was picking up the crypto library without the flag.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

Second Law of Business Meetings:
        If there are two possible ways to spell a person's name, you
        will pick the wrong one.

Corollary:
        If there is only one way to spell a name,
        you will spell it wrong, anyway.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple