X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=kMAuc
	osoaY8GcZP1Z7LOELHlCQWd43f3UrTqj2nW6YQZ02C7p4FkN4p2lOQjv7uGrf5GC
	CztaL4CL7m8RPqpym7eb3SIaatiXSg59vaZ6HNhufX4Vy6iNcZggBl6dgt4TmS9h
	ertsUjxO1xcxSyo+S2VNQFJgObHOlZbaHh5qnM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=7uSxPgqcCEn
	0M4xFANtueFt/O8c=; b=opAygbeuFRiY+O42LF2IgRsvTHQkg5E0BICqbfI8IBB
	T5aDoncb3WGtBAl1/8R7GZ7BwlfcBDUJpv/0SKE89LGHibTx5Qv5ijEMvoyxdLzd
	Msz96e0MHGtZeW9rdXj2DsUoSJ/g358CMEq8YPhStgQ4ZrgAhl83lmzHM7JqbDBU
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-in-05.arcor-online.net
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-14.arcor-online.net 3lV0yJ3z58z4nRd
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-0.7
References: <announce DOT 20150417103517 DOT GV3657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<87pp72sei6 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>	<20150418083919 DOT GJ3657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<87h9sd4vl6 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>	<20150418102025 DOT GL3657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<87d2314srf DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>	<20150418110755 DOT GM3657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:05:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20150418110755.GM3657@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's	message of "Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:07:55 +0200")
Message-ID: <87d230irez.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> What we *could* try to do is to tweak the actual SYSTEM and Admins ACE,
> though.  Rather than ignoring the CLASS_OBJ/ACL_MASK value completely
> for them, we could apply the execute bit part only.  Usually it doesn't
> make sense for SYSTEM/Admins having execute perms if nobody else has
> since it's with high probability no executable file.

I think that would resolve this particular problem and leaves the
inherited part of the ACL as is.

> Would that make sense?

To me, yes.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple