X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=TZrd9OzCTBrdvAzJR3n7rNPyLWnZo1gEOcuWqUfdHL5 HWOB/4ldJkaW5fOr87dYmLqprdtWgebSdLvGHKKUwcfAk++WOHptpiJ9H8G4qUjD TXJ/eMYUBHtSlHKBlYBm0eKN0NFPyD1KmT+fYGbXtv6LJMWaTec5uXw2Z7fe/h9E = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=mTP9KcK7k1WgA0cMiYz23UHN6hM=; b=ivfBBSGOpHO1jL4HY 02KMuVdsZ4yZSKJehhCAqxW34Qg1CGilv54o5v6H8lMkvC9pmfOg2KipFAA2f4FG Hg52OlnbpVSrTC99bRYu4Rs05FBU4FnSGPIQlfaaN8aLrdoEZ/9LKI2UfX2Ew+KA Q2JFvhMgC/XMDcw7JzStsyk6UU= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <1429158329.9844.26.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1 From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:25:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20150411103504 DOT GD7343 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 14:22 -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > The version number is 2.0.0-0.1. Yes, we're going full Torvalds > > with the release numbers and bump them to 2.0. > > Will this result in a cygwin2.dll with a different ABI? No, ABI compatibility will be kept. That's what we meant by "going full Torvalds", as in the Linux 3.0 and 4.0 version bumps. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple