X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=uk scXg7oDet5ULeCdsoRdu1d7ezHeW1PcLVF6GJhGWxyBY1weLyuG0fI8E8jEosaV1 J9VgsUsUJ/1Dw7miAVodSQVjhJpviK04nRv4CnW8c9P0SlzBz71hhSiPL1rlo0zM V01N4BDMXBTvRU5KruAxeLuyIwnM0Hxm6oJZZ/HgU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=Y6JxgGh0 HuhI/7S/dkjacoV+DJQ=; b=TbxvBPuFdTFpjbPCRf4kliulWDSycqJfBxwn7bxi ep/X01rrbI9NUoLIB6QGWCJQ8yHknoAIt1ATAlSOzzcpF4+3Jd6U2MuMpplHX89C dkDZyLRYebKg17MpghjbUwpSLb0qEr1vb+V9tlgaPNGjgL638v6wWQLUSg7QyZTS 500= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f170.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.29.110 with SMTP id j14mr1535650igh.4.1429136366966; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:19:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <552ECFAC.7040003@winfirst.com> References: <1923978077 DOT 20150414135419 AT yandex DOT ru> <552D7120 DOT 9000409 AT gmail DOT com> <552D8C5E DOT 2020208 AT winfirst DOT com> <552ECFAC DOT 7040003 AT winfirst DOT com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:19:26 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dig utility in bind-utils-9.9.7-1 returns no output From: Keith Christian To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Thanks Mark, but I tried both of those early in my attempts without success. Good suggestion, though. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: > On 4/15/2015 12:02 PM, Keith Christian wrote: >> >> cygcheck attachment is too large according to sourceware. >> >> What specific parts of cygcheck are needed to help troubleshoot this? >> >> Keith >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Keith Christian >> wrote: >>> >>> Both /usr/bin/dig and /bin/dig run the same program: >>> >>>> cksum /usr/bin/dig /bin/dig >>> >>> 680300229 2202141 /usr/bin/dig >>> 680300229 2202141 /bin/dig >>> >>> Attached cygcheck_s_r_v_kvc.txt. > > > I'm sorry - I could be completely off-base here. What I meant was can you > try running > '/usr/bin/dig' (providing the full path to the application) rather than by > just running 'dig' > just in case there is some other 'dig' on your path (or shell aliases) which > might be running > rather than the actual /usr/bin/dig command. > > In previous messages, your examples were running 'dig' (without the full > path) so it wasn't > clear which dig you were actually getting. > > Good luck. > > >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you sure that you're getting the correct dig executable? Is it >>>> possible >>>> that something else in >>>> your path or alias list is getting hit? Perhaps you can try >>>> /usr/bin/dig >>>> just to be sure? > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple