X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=oS 41D0jpc55oHsUeQixcPRbddfBMhuF3A7Xbo2zrm5kUeq9C2e5GxNll6/3+6ZvCys 3BSn7UitZKhC3tNdgYCjjxa5ys3dD9Y/zLjsnCRyy1ihLPMvOfddynXq4EbSlkGu kuGSZCTbeRRwg6YdGxV+C6VrhnUM+tL7xndV5kUSM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=6/xT1/+l iQD2A09pZ7wPEap+xtY=; b=AT5fRrSmuR95a53gz5woakBXViZzTxPeXN2zg4hb +AiMs18BXcCRL7xBfGaW+0aryFu0gYMYWvbuUcNNCusvU75Vl7zn5ixw50VlOmzi Xj7Z4EJ3cpHl98M96EugRzAgGrrn7Qv8FDuxFJ0oj1Xd9cp8G2tvi/ItpnXU/Hkl 03Q= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f181.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.29.110 with SMTP id j14mr418243igh.4.1429124573179; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:02:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1923978077 DOT 20150414135419 AT yandex DOT ru> <552D7120 DOT 9000409 AT gmail DOT com> <552D8C5E DOT 2020208 AT winfirst DOT com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:02:53 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dig utility in bind-utils-9.9.7-1 returns no output From: Keith Christian To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes cygcheck attachment is too large according to sourceware. What specific parts of cygcheck are needed to help troubleshoot this? Keith On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Keith Christian wrote: > Both /usr/bin/dig and /bin/dig run the same program: > >>cksum /usr/bin/dig /bin/dig > 680300229 2202141 /usr/bin/dig > 680300229 2202141 /bin/dig > > Attached cygcheck_s_r_v_kvc.txt. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: >> Are you sure that you're getting the correct dig executable? Is it possible >> that something else in >> your path or alias list is getting hit? Perhaps you can try /usr/bin/dig >> just to be sure? >> >> >> -- >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >> -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple