X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=yaeCVKUezYBgjmy1FrDsh/vUekaClOiuv8qNCh8txBHhUMRQ5WwPb
	wwW0Xm5B8ofNIaf870EBGLX8N4VnPy1BCicNiF+qDUNFtmP9f+IMPVPWwu0zhck0
	qYeJhJcFSEJ2k+fpQdCK0v3DWy2LddhUJcoFDdY9pdYfHXwwFNgiI8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=vidB1Pw1OF9iR/t6WMaS2mfI3Qg=; b=QvtgLjEg1GAxXOEZtDBvJIiIQozV
	fWUm3gcdQiLTTveCaMmWg1hQeBDNm7ln78duLu/6YXr8P4UJsdq39eKfddVGvT58
	OjxbXg5tLYRc7q/N3apiJE/gOTPmBxtznqKUkPiXukdg15n8dkh0x40EHP/SYFb9
	lT6A5FGZ96+tkFU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:21:25 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-3
Message-ID: <20150414182125.GQ7343@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <2bbd046b7e2ea40818416d8a6d3f15b8 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20150414085757 DOT GC7343 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <0ff693d9c8109bdddf3d892d005678b7 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20150414145052 DOT GF7343 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <b962c3b9b72680589885fce04084640e DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20150414151255 DOT GM7343 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <b3fe246a234bd7f6ee6c9b0ea088abe0 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20150414154527 DOT GN7343 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <e9ab557069048406daec796d781a60f5 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YGTp3YEHyFTiE1eD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e9ab557069048406daec796d781a60f5.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--YGTp3YEHyFTiE1eD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 14 18:32, Houder wrote:
> > On Apr 14 17:26, Houder wrote:
> >> >        Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
> >> >
> >> > The only reason I can think of is that the parent dir has default
> >> > permissions which imply the mask value already.  So, what does
> >> > `icacls . | cat' in this directory print?
> >>
> >> %% icacls . | cat
> >> . NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
> >>   Seven\Test:(F)
> >>   Seven\None:(RX)
> >>   Everyone:(RX)
> >>   NULL SID:(OI)(CI)(IO)(DENY)(Rc,S,REA,X,DC)
> >
> > As I thought.  There's a mask value already in there which influences
> > how the default permissions are inherited.  You created this dir with
> > Cygwin 2.0 already, right?  Remove the masks with
>=20
> You created this dir with Cygwin 2.0 already, right? Correct! I did not
> occur to me to start all over again ...

No, me neither, sorry.

> >   $ setfacl -d m:,d:m: .
> >
> > and try again.
> >
> >>   CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)
> >>   CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
> >>   Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
> >
> > This *should* work now.  I fear you have to remove the masks from
> > all files and dirs created by Cygwin 2.0.  Sorry, but that's what
> > testing is for ;}
>=20
> No problem at all ...
>=20
> Btw, I will only report back on this in case you are INcorrect above.

Uhm... I wouldn't be too unhappy to get positive feedback as well...


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--YGTp3YEHyFTiE1eD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=ywLY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YGTp3YEHyFTiE1eD--