X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nR4MsHBbI32cOvgSzoodA5c/+mT+EF/G+8HU3NcMS3/ ZZ6+YLUXq5+7CZN5OJXAXgINX3CZaArAh1/gG7j5v3eX9tIHBRYjHXDl3ZqjsUCY Qb3A4rdVxkBj6qpai4pM449mHfXvzHmIEIwGHwucrgrB9sEcb+SsXfDEq8l8/piE = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=N7Kt9/4akzA3ao057aaae8my7Ac=; b=p/50uUzuDx39wlQS2 q3/EWL+mQ6fnNGM6/JjxQuPOG6JbBAN5Kl1aBwM2sDCo0kdpvomudGttIacFObxi Vfpjq5/8aNEHyb9kj/UdMrj/4zp+kUqLvpGl5F4lbR3wVmKu5NpFfi6vwvG809NW yIMfpgATtTFymkkvDQD6YlL2gY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CrAQDV0SpV/91c0lUNT4NeXAHGQIV6AwICgXQBAQEBAQGFHQEBAQMBOEAGCwsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQEFiBkVtDiXIwEBAQcBAQEBHosrgmaCHRaEFwWEWYoZhhOEFYMekAKDTYIlHIFRbgGCQgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2CrAQDV0SpV/91c0lUNT4NeXAHGQIV6AwICgXQBAQEBAQGFHQEBAQMBOEAGCwsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQEFiBkVtDiXIwEBAQcBAQEBHosrgmaCHRaEFwWEWYoZhhOEFYMekAKDTYIlHIFRbgGCQgEBAQ Message-ID: <552AD2DD.6040306@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:17:33 +0100 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer References: <54E73A20 DOT 2020706 AT lauterbach DOT com> <54E74A68 DOT 2060501 AT gmail DOT com> <20150220154232 DOT GY26084 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54E7C0F0 DOT 8070303 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <552A42DC DOT 9080703 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <552A42DC.9080703@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 12/04/15 11:03, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Removing the cygwin specific usage of > cygwin_conv_to_posix_path / cygwin_conv_path > did the work. Make check passed on 64bit, and make doc fails > on a corner case, most of the HTML documentation was built. OK, so I couldn't resist a little play :-) Seemed to work well with all the '.ly' files I threw at it. I generated PDF, PNG and MIDI files successfully. I tried a few files from a web site with lots of freely available lilypond files, and a couple of files gave warnings. If you try: wget http://www.mutopiaproject.org/ftp/PaganiniN/O1/Caprice_23/Caprice_23.ly lilypond --formats=pdf,png Caprice_23.ly Then you see repeated instances of the following warnings: warning: no PostScript font name for font `/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/ncenR24.pcf.gz' warning: FreeType face has no PostScript font name programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: -inf staff space Setting to zero. continuing, cross fingers I didn't have time to cross my fingers, but the resulting output files all looked fine ;-) I ran the same test using the stock 'lilypond' package in Fedora 21 (the version of lilypond is the same), and the warnings weren't generated. The first warning is a little baffling, as lilypond knows where the PostScript fonts are (the path is specified as a ./configure option). It's worth saying that most of the files I tried worked fine without generating warnings. BTW, I assume you're aware that the 'lilypond-doc' package is missing most of its content, and that this will be fully populated when the 'corner case' you mentioned is ironed out. > The 32 bit builds but does not works. I suspect there is an additional > problem with the underlying dependencies, or we are triggering an > existing problem not visible on Linux platform. Have you tried the old version of lilypond we have in x86 at the moment? I couldn't get it to work at all. Every '.ly' file I passed to it (even simple ones) caused a segmentation fault. So your suspicion about one of the dependencies looks well founded. Dave. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple