DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=usuErcbOgh7yrBvNqlNFSvIsKKwHG5oP8+MgKaTABets7uePdjhw0
	iCopNW/p/THcjhJECR3cuoSdwHhONzWDYNRKeADmap28wzGgdGxS2yVJzp0CwkLD
	oNdJDlT7h5VAEnbiH7nYLvAzrEOLSao6VO0zuy/weEqTBDtPI5IcV4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:11:05 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin version numbers [Was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-1]
Message-ID: <20150412191105.GB1716@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 20150411103504 DOT GD7343 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <552A8C03 DOT 2070306 AT dinwoodie DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <552A8C03.2070306@dinwoodie.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 12 16:15, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >The version number is  2.0.0-0.1.  Yes, we're going full Torvalds with
> > the release numbers and bump them to 2.0.  In future, bugfix releases
> > will bump the last number, new feature releases will bump the middle
> > number.
> >
> > Bugfix?  2.0.1, 2.0.2, ...
> > New features?  2.1, 2.2, ...
>=20
> Does this mean the version number distinction between the GPL and proprie=
ty
> versions of the Cygwin DLL are disappearing?

There is no propriety version of the Cygwin DLL.  The distinction (the
idea being about 15 years old) was only for the sake of being able to
identify the upstream from the supported version.  The supported version
will just get an own subversion and a marker, along the lines of
"2.0.5rh".

> IIRC it's currently the case
> that version 1.<even> indicates a closed-source license version, and 1.<o=
dd>
> indicates a GPL-licensed version.

There are no Cygwin versions for which the source code isn't available,
While, technically, a third party can purchase a GPL buyout for their
own, proprietary product, the Cygwin sources are always freely available.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=YC3E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2--