X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=euwskrTDPpTdFkV/SGievppk0oeus1Bnl7zWZEnIuxWL4P6YM+S0l 7DAx8lAZVPGn1YIWoKYZDxYvLvtiXTrS0DsndtKniR6Douo2tyjf8f6Op6enJTs3 dLB9OniylPvhrzaagPt6xJqMOe7hDvqvzcsIb4fWqEWZRy4D895yA8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=ebH6CeVY1SjwvJLxhypZqygchuQ=; b=YpKlOAHPfIs8sn8oDbBFvfKqoRf3 NhJ4Q6rB7VzQU8PIgIaMgMWA77iBkOca9hikLFMyYX4Lfxmt1AnMK6bReLjLGvF9 91i/RKf67fxPgVI38VhLTi6Jhpp3IkdzixIrGeUO/+WKfCFd0hDc8lSBEU7wYej+ TaDJEZnPFOvb7Lo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:07:52 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [TESTERS needed] New POSIX permission handling Message-ID: <20150411100752.GE19111@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20150410100703 DOT GA4401 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150411094020 DOT GB19111 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HnQK338I3UIa/qiP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150411094020.GB19111@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) --HnQK338I3UIa/qiP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Apr 11 11:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer > > > snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > >=20 > > Here is the test I ran: > >=20 > > $ cd /cygdrive/c > >=20 > > $ touch ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh ~+/{charlie,delta}.sh > >=20 > > $ chmod +x ~/bravo.sh ~+/delta.sh > >=20 > > $ ls -l --color ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh ~+/{charlie,delta}.sh > > -rw-rw-r--+ 1 John None 0 Apr 10 16:51 /cygdrive/c/charlie.sh > > -rwxrwxr-x+ 1 John None 0 Apr 10 16:51 /cygdrive/c/delta.sh (gre= en) > > -rw-r--r-- 1 John None 0 Apr 10 16:51 /home/John/alpha.sh > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 John None 0 Apr 10 16:51 /home/John/bravo.sh (gre= en) > >=20 > > So "charlie.sh" looks strange because it has that extra write permissio= n. > > However this is not a big deal for me. My concern was that everything w= as > > showing up executable (green) when running "ls --color". So overall thi= s is an > > improvement, thanks. >=20 > What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature? >=20 > Did you check the ACL? The ACL before and after the change should > explain what happened. Check it with getfacl *and* icacls to get > an idea what it looks like, and compare the result with the POSIX > ACL rules, as outlined on, e.g., http://linux.die.net/man/5/acl. On second thought, what you need to know is what the NULL DENY ACE looks like when looking at it in icacls. The following bits in the NULL DENY access mask are used: Windows access <-> POSIX access -------------- ------------ FILE_READ_DATA S_ISVTX FILE_WRITE_DATA S_ISGID FILE_APPEND_DATA S_ISUID FILE_READ_EA MASK S_IXOTH (POSIX execute perms) FILE_WRITE_EA MASK S_IWOTH (POSIX write perms) FILE_EXECUTE MASK S_IROTH (POSIX read perms) FILE_DELETE_CHILD Set if MASK is valid READ_CONTROL Set to mark this as a "new style" ACL. SYNCHRONIZE Has no meaning, but icacls has a bug in printing the access mask of DENY ACEs. Same bits are used in the inheritable NULL DENY, but S_ISVTX and S_ISUID should never be set, because they are not supposed to be inherited, HTH, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --HnQK338I3UIa/qiP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVKPJ4AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gfg8P/3HJPvIBarc1HqfyacTuGZR6 azhnIB9n/IQloA4/aCRzGzYpiGeRAkyVe35Gej6TdRj47aPP4TqiOV5syQ8AJnVR wiBtMiACU3VKjpRblzxzCnNzVwg/29xMXg0q77TWcBJrTn9+jloDsD4d85ywiJxk EIOL0aYEZV/56l/ONjFBlRY/Xlq6zAVr92A1VCy7NPeMm6Z/x1KSd6m7RkBrZ+Lm Nx9EY0Rpm9cHUsTtrotcCXhimLgyGMeV1Q/3Hp/eDJQX8+5mSBbGQ4YyQze2GE4N Glv5xOKVFOeuEPwUGHEDAcJjN7x3PSkeK/ILul9p5DSGOsK+o+sak1TSyNhjwm6k 4K48nSn5n/cgzLdhKgU/piKIbpqaz7MvY/++1PWXkKRaV01/kn9g9//gRF5VGyvD Mp5+WcAyT9MAymogzmRz8dvea99ENeI8YTUPfabqONyUg0huiJCjiEwN2Z8qrWfD VWg/cyBpbhPDJI7j2Du3VJ7SqeVyPI1KNbD5y4jSB+nfSnizWxAL6cpoDtDTRLwf PP+nmIXSqloFDxZP+Uz7zlzjZMWO+vyH2Kr40AvdGNIjBsIV+LrPsX5KIH4ptbfn +30vEJQGkmV3JHGyraJM5/xLBeqfTwmBFviZAiAggkB+2H3DNAGo0OH7UlDCVdEm RRiSv4w+/Ynf/UrMWHb5 =Wc1V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HnQK338I3UIa/qiP--