X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=XZIG4 +2jXkcXDsAqGkr5Mab771CFZPRlRh9foz/nG/lVswYFqfVSZJXNUAcYtdtHnJXk3 EpGwGqWL/TlJUMU+sVhQR9l2a/jp+emelFq1/WXgChY7vDGD9nvGlAc8TFge9Brz AbucofA714oKa1GVSZmbnJh/wm6H13eNHCX4Z8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=my6X7nGffZM /9f2lLCzUgcvLCjw=; b=acAVLk0PF3TjpsW4hOvQftDi4O6ZTCbkddOIBgluBLm cImrU8HWFYGS674FQxD1OJ+1lTnlh4mTN1cUPTG1nZ+U2Gu0U3gv7g8wJLYQXzju +7aLXP8sn76o+bJ6aY5sydJTiuwyV9J2359CvjF1acRFYh6dA5QjjxRCgfzFPnho = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-in-03.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-04.arcor-online.net 3lP9Hk4clmz5FXb From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Rebase, Peflags, and cygserver References: <87619mw5gd DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:04:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Jim Reisert's message of "Sun, 5 Apr 2015 23:02:52 -0600") Message-ID: <87h9snc9z1.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jim Reisert AD1C writes: > From a "Cygwin Terminal" (MINTTY), after shutting down the X.org > server, I ran the: Did you check that really no other Cygwin processes were running? > rebase-trigger fullrebase > > command. Then I ran setup-x86, nothing to update, but let it rebase > anyway. Then I restarted my X.org server, and an xterm, then finally > Cygwin Emacs (emacs-X11). I still can not get rid of this fork error: > > 0 [main] emacs-X11 10520 child_info_fork::abort: > C:\Cygwin\bin\cyggs-9.dll: Loaded to different address: > parent(0x1E60000) != child(0x1BC0000) I've never seen such low addresses without a head-on collision in address space or BLODA interference. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple