X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=o5uJ1UM9ro+cJOIldB80zZEcHJVFnpzT2O4OcZ7D4uy LZedXmeOtkPnMEwy5ncERkDG+TXFkS5cZo5lceG9ybZwj9RSjWz6quFl2GVf/6LF B4/RK/VkMFtd1JDKZvGnHLwKixvFCTHGAzYMxgpRXqQEJ8OV5znwrusOCdUQWEtA = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=tjXUYQEJfawoi6HEJPWeRfBXZOs=; b=R1Aerghg30FcJxptJ vEcOCGj7a5oduL8ab2LmPkKgSYwAe8k7DEQmCYU3fiRaFLL6WIbezyO+7m/cftlW LxTrEdmJkhpoWGftUMHJkji9NzMoDHYSvaYNIr1JY8xETetkhY62dDNpTjQ0VV2n w1uyZMkIGkdFFgOoxa+a3aU3Js= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CXAQASrxFV//5S0lUNT4NYWsZKhSxEAwICggsBAQEBAQGFEgEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIOK4bmwQBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBARqLIYR9FoQXBY5ChX2aLIQQbwGCQgEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A2CXAQASrxFV//5S0lUNT4NYWsZKhSxEAwICggsBAQEBAQGFEgEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIOK4bmwQBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBARqLIYR9FoQXBY5ChX2aLIQQbwGCQgEBAQ Message-ID: <5511AF73.9070607@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:39:47 +0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: static vs. shared linking References: <5510A9AB DOT 7020607 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> In-Reply-To: <5510A9AB.7020607@tiscali.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 24/03/2015 00:02, David Stacey wrote: > I've been having difficulty building poco-1.6.0 for Cygwin for some > time. I've managed to produce a test case that shows the problem: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/119453582/Cygwin/crashtest.tar.xz > > This archive contains source files that produce a very simple library. > When linked statically, the code works fine. However, when linked as a > shared DLL, the test crashes with a core dump. The behaviour is > identical on x86 and x86_64 architectures. > > Have I made a stupid error in the compilation of the shared case, or is > something more interesting going on? I don't know if anyone has managed to look at this. I haven't had a deluge of e-mails telling me that I've done something silly (which is a shame, because then I could fix it quickly and move on). For the sake of a straw to clutch at, I tried compiling with clang++ rather than g++, and got the same result: $ ./go.sh Running test (static link)... Done. Running test (shared link)... ./go.sh: line 19: 3744 Aborted (core dumped) ./shared_test Done. Any help or hints would be greatly appreciated. Dave. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple